How safe is your car ?

Select one or more vehicles among the following possibilities.

OR
OR
All results & rewards
Menu
2015 Info

Mazda CX-3

City and Supermini
Rating Expired Icon Rating Expired

Share this on:
Publication: Sept 2015

Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment

Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment

text a changé
  • Adult Occupant

    85%
    See More
  • Child Occupant

    79%
    See More
  • Pedestrian

    84%
    See More
  • Safety Assist

    64%
    See More
Total 32.4 Pts / 85%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier
7.5 Pts
Passenger
Driver
Frontal Full Width
7.1 Pts
Rear Passenger
Driver
Lateral Impact
16.0 Pts
Car
Pole
Whiplash Rear Impact
1.8 Pts
Rear Seat
Front Seat
AEB City
0.0 Pts
Performance:
Not Available

Comments
Total 39.1 Pts / 79%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Crash Test Performance 22.1 Pts
18 months old child
12 Pts
Tested restraint (Fit): Britax Römer BabySafe + ISOFIX Base
Good
36 months old child
10.1 Pts
Tested restraint (Fit): Britax Römer Duo Plus
Adequate

Safety Features 5.0 Pts
Front
Passenger
2nd row
outboard
2nd row
center
Isofix
i-Size
Integrated CRS
  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
  • Not Available
CRS Installation Check 12.0 Pts
crs
Installation
  • Easy
  • Difficult
  • Safety critical
  • Not allowed
Seat Position
Front 2nd row
Passenger Left center Right
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt)
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt)
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX)
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX)
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX)
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX)
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX)
  • Easy
  • Difficult
  • Safety critical
  • Not allowed
Detailed Test Results
Comments
Total 30.3 Pts / 84%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
VRU Impact Protection
30.3 Pts
VRU Impact Protection

Head Impact 20.0 Pts

Pelvis Impact 4.3 Pts

Leg Impact 6.0 Pts


Comments
Total 8.3 Pts / 64%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Speed Assistance 1.3 Pts
System Name Adjustable Speed Limiter
Speed Limit Information Function N/A
Warning Function Manually set
Speed Limitation Function Manually set
Electronic Stability Control 3 Pts
System Name DSC
Performance
Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s 3.3% meets ECE requirements
Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s 3% meets ECE requirements
Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s 2.98 m meets ECE requirements
Seatbelt Reminder 3.0 Pts
Applies To All seats
Warning Driver Seat Front Passenger(s) Rear Passenger(s)
Visual
Audible
  • Pass
  • Fail
  • Not available
Lane Support 1.0 Pts
System Name LDWS
Type Lane Departure Warning
Operational From 70 km/h
Warning Audible & Visual
Performance
LDW Confirmation Test
Pass
AEB Inter-Urban 0 Pts
Comments
  • Specifications
  • Safety Equipment
  • Videos
  • Rating Validity

Specifications

Tested Model Mazda CX-3 2.0 'Core', LHD

Body Type - 5 door wagon

Year Of Publication 2015

Kerb Weight 1231kg

VIN From Which Rating Applies - all CX-3s

Class City and Supermini

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION
Front Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Belt Pretensioner
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Belt Loadlimiter
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Knee Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
LATERAL CRASH PROTECTION
Side Head Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Side Chest Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Side Pelvis Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
CHILD PROTECTION
Isofix/i-Size
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Integrated Child Seat
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Airbag cut-off switch
Driver
Passenger
Rear
SAFETY ASSIST
Seatbelt Reminder
Driver
Passenger
Rear
OTHER SAFETY SYSTEMS
Active Bonnet
Active Bonnet
ESC
ESC
AEB City
AEB City
AEB Interurban
AEB Interurban
Speed Assistance
Speed Assistance
Lane Assist System
Lane Assist System

Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as option
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
  • Not Available
  • Not Applicable

Videos

Rating Validity

Annual Reviews and Facelifts

Date
Event
Outcome
September 2015
Rating Published
2015
September 2016
Annual Review
2015
December 2016
Facelift Review
2015
September 2017
Annual Review
2015
September 2018
Annual Review
2015
September 2019
Annual Review
2015
September 2020
Annual Review
2015
September 2021
Annual Review
2015
January 2022
Rating Expired
2015

Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment



Share

Subscribe for our latest news