Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
79% -
See More
![]()
78% -
See More
![]()
78% -
See More
![]()
68%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
 |
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
 |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
The NP300 Navara scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy in the full scale crash tests. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive and protection was good apart from marginally elevated neck tensile forces. In the side barrier test, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Most of the child restraints for which the NP300 Navara has been designed could be correctly installed and accommodated. However, the top tether routing of the group 1 Universal ISOFIX restraint was not straightforward and there is insufficient space for the support leg of the group 0+/1 semi-universal restraint.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 16.1 Pts
Pelvis Impact 6.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The protection provided to pedestrians' legs and to the pelvic area was good, with maximum points scored in Euro NCAP's tests. The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was adequate at almost all test points.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | Speed limit |
| Speed Limit Information Function | N/A |
| Warning Function | Manually set |
| Speed Limitation Function | Manually set |
| System Name | VDC Vehicle Dynamic Control | |
| Performance | ||
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 5.7% | meets ECE requirements |
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 3.7% | meets ECE requirements |
| Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.8 m | meets ECE requirements |
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
| Type | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| Operational From | 5 km/h | |||
| Additional Information | Default On | |||
| Performance | | ||||
| Autobrake Function Only | Driver reacts to warning | |||
| Operational Speed | 5-200 km/h | 5-200 km/h | ||
| Approaching a stationary car | See AEB City | Crash avoided up to 35km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 70km/h. | ||
| Approaching a slower moving car | Crash avoided up to 45km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 70km/h. | Crash avoided up to 75km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 80km/h. | ||
| Following a car at short distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Mitigation | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Mitigation | Mitigation | ||
| Following a car at long distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Mitigation | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Mitigation | Avoidance | ||
The NP300 Navara has electronic stability control as standard, together with a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limiter is also standard equipment, while the autonomous emergency braking system is an option that is expected to be fitted to sufficient vehicles for its inter-urban functionality to qualify for assessment and Euro NCAP's tests revealed adequate system performance. Lane assistance is not available on the NP300 Navara.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Nissan NP300 Navara, 2.3 diesel, mid grade, LHD
Body Type - 4 door double cab
Year Of Publication 2015
Kerb Weight 2045kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - All Double Cab NP300 Navaras
Class Pickup Truck
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Nissan showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good for the head, neck and the femurs/pelvis. However, dummy readings of chest compression indicated a marginal level of chest protection. For the rear passenger, chest protection was rated as poor, based on chest compression and seatbelt loads, with good or adequate protection of other critical body areas. The NP300 Navara scored full points in the side impact barrier test, with good protection of all body areas. In the more severe side pole impact, protection was also good except for the chest, protection of which was adequate. Tests on the front seats and head restraints showed that good protection would be provided against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor protection for the occupants of those seats. The NP300 Navara has an optional autonomous emergency braking system to provide additional whiplash protection at low speeds typical of city driving. As the system is not standard, its low-speed functionality did not qualify for assessment.