Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
79% -
See More
![]()
79% -
See More
![]()
67% -
See More
![]()
25%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult
Safety critical| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X1 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, chest decelerations of the 6 year dummy's chest showed poor protection, exceeding recommended safe limits. Similiarly, neck tensile forces in the 10 year dummy indicated weak protection of this part of the body. The front passenger airbag can be deactivated to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in this sitting position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Ignis is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 18.4 Pts
Pelvis Impact 3.9 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection for the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians's legs while protection of the pelvis was more mixed, with results ranging from good to poor. The optional 'Dual Brake Support' safety pack has an autonomous emergency braking system that detects pedestrians. The results of that system are not included in this assessment.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
The Ignis has, as standard, a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. As part of its optional safety pack, it also has a highway-speed autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system and a lane departure warning system. The results of those systems are not included in this assessment.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Suzuki Ignis 1.2 GL, 4x2, LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2016
Kerb Weight 820kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Ignis variants
Class City and Supermini
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Ignis remained stable in the offset deformable frontal impact test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Suzuki showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and those sat in different positions. Compression of the driver dummy's chest indicated weak protection of this part of the body and injury parameters for the lower legs revealed marginal protection. In the full width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest was rated as marginal for both the driver and rear passenger side dummy, as was the head protection for the rear dummy. In the side barrier impact, the Ignis scored full points with good protection of all critical body regions. Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints revealed good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision, as did a geometric assessment of the rear seats. The Ignis has low-speed autonomous emergency braking as part of its optional 'Dual Camera Brake Support' safety pack. The results of that system are not included in this assessment.