Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
81% -
See More
![]()
78% -
See More
![]()
43% -
See More
![]()
43%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Based on dummy readings in the frontal and side barrier tests, the Spark scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year dummy. Both dummies were sat in forward facing child restraints. Forward movement of the head was well controlled in each case. In the side impact, the dummies' were properly contained by the protective shell of their restraints. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not clear. A permanently attached label warns of the dangers of using a rearward facing child seat in that position without first disabling the airbag.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 9.6 Pts
Pelvis Impact 0.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet offered poor protection and scored no points. In those areas likely to be struck by the head of an adult, the bonnet offered predominantly poor protection.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | ESP | |
| Performance | ||
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
Fail--safetyAssistCommentEN--
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Chevrolet Spark 1.0 base grade, LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2009
Kerb Weight 978kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all Sparks of the specification tested
Class City and Supermini
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the head and neck but deflection of the chest indicated marginal protection for the chest of both driver and passenger. Structures in the dashboard posed a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of both the driver and the passenger. The Spark scored maximum points in the side barrier impact. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. Marginal protection was provided against whiplash injurues in the event of rear impact.