Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
93% -
See More
![]()
74% -
See More
![]()
68% -
See More
![]()
66%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
 |
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
 |
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Based on dummy readings, the CR-V scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ dummy in the dynamic tests. In the frontal test, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their respective restraints, minimising the likelihood of dangerous head contact with parts of the car interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the instructions for changing the airbag status were not permanently attached and the system was not rewarded. The dangers of using a rearward-facing restraint in that seating position without disabling the airbag were clearly indicated in the vehicle. The CR-V could accommodate the child restraint categories for which it is designed. However, care should be taken when installing a number of the restraints to make sure they are correctly installed. The vehicle lost points because installation was not straightforward for some restraints.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 15.8 Pts
Pelvis Impact 2.9 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection it offered to pedestrians' legs. The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | VSA | |
| Performance | ||
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 2.426% | meets ECE requirements |
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 2.052% | meets ECE requirements |
| Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.99 m | meets ECE requirements |
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
Electronic stability control is standard equipment on the CR-V and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limitation device is also standard equipment.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Honda CR-V 2.2 diesel SE, RHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2013
Kerb Weight 1653kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all CR-V's of the specification tested
Class Small SUV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dumy readings showed good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Honda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier impact, which represents the car being struck from the side by another vehicle, the CR-V scored maximum points with good protection of all body regions. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest and abdomen was adequate and that of the head and pelvis was good. The front seats and head restraints provided good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.