Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
92% -
See More
![]()
84% -
See More
![]()
80% -
See More
![]()
83%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult
Safety critical| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
The XF scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy in the dynamic impact tests. In the frontal offset test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive and protection was good except for marginally elevated neck tension. In the side barrier impact, both dummies were properly contained in the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the XF is designed could be correctly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 18.6 Pts
Pelvis Impact 4.6 Pts
Leg Impact 5.9 Pts
The XF has an 'active' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet, providing greater clearance between the surface and hard structures in the engine compartment. Jaguar showed that the system worked robustly for a range of speeds and a variety of pedestrian statures. Accordingly, the bonnet was tested in the deployed (raised) position. Protection was almost exclusively good or adequate on the bonnet surface, with poor results recorded along the bottom edge of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided predoninantly good protection to pedestrians' legs. The protection provided to the pelvic region was more mixed, results ranging from weak to good.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Speed Limit Information Function | N/A |
| Warning Function | Manually set |
| Speed Limitation Function | Manually set |
| System Name | Dynamic Stability Control | |
| Performance | ||
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 0.9% | meets ECE requirements |
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 0.7% | meets ECE requirements |
| Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.5 m | meets ECE requirements |
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Lane Departure Warning |
| Type | Lane Departure Warning |
| Operational From | 48 km/h |
| Warning | Visual & Haptic |
| Performance | |
|
LDW Confirmation Test
|
Pass |
| System Name | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
| Type | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| Operational From | 10 km/h | |||
| Additional Information | Default On | |||
| Performance | | ||||
| Autobrake Function Only | Driver reacts to warning | |||
| Operational Speed | 10-80 km/h | 10-80 km/h | ||
| Approaching a stationary car | See AEB City | Crash avoided up to 45km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 80km/h. | ||
| Approaching a slower moving car | Crash avoided up to 60km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 70km/h. | Crash avoided up to 75km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 80km/h. | ||
| Following a car at short distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Mitigation | Mitigation | ||
| Following a car at long distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Mitigation | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Mitigation | Mitigation | ||
All features assessed by Euro NCAP for Safety Assist are standard equipment on the XF: it has electronic stability control; a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats; a driver-set speed limiter; a lane departure warning system; and its autonomous emergency braking system works also at inter-urban speeds and demonstrated good performance in Euro NCAP's tests. Cars before VIN number 15300 differ from the test vehicles in having a seatbelt reminder which is is not sufficiently loud and clear to meet Euro NCAP's requirements.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Jaguar XF 2.0 diesel Prestige, RHD
Body Type - 4 door saloon
Year Of Publication 2015
Kerb Weight 1642kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all XFs, including Sportbrakes, from VIN 15300
Class Executive Car
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Euro NCAP is satisfied, on the basis of data it has reviewed, that the result of the tested saloon variant can be applied also to Sportbrake variants.
Share
The passenger compartment of the XF remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. Jaguar showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different seating positions. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection of the driver and rear passenger was good for all critical body regions except the chest, protection of which was adequate. In the side barrier impact, dummy results indicated good protection of all critical body areas. However, both doors on the struck side of the vehicle became unlatched during the test and, although neither door opened, the car was penalised. No doors opened in the more severe side pole test and protection was good for all critical parts of the body. In Euro NCAP's tests, the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection for the occupants of those seats. The XF has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system which provides additional protection against whiplash at low, city speeds. The system performed well in Euro NCAP's tests.