Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
87% -
See More
![]()
81% -
See More
![]()
41% -
See More
![]()
71%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as optionThe Juke scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year old dummy in the dynamic tests. Movement of both child’s heads was controlled in the frontal impact and side barrier test. The front seat passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear. The dangers of using a rearward facing seat in that seat without first disabling the airbag were clearly explained and permanently visible on the sun visor in the appropriate European languages.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 9.5 Pts
Pelvis Impact 0.8 Pts
Leg Impact 4.4 Pts
The bonnet provided good protection in most areas likely to be struck by a child's head, but was almost completely poor in those areas where an adult’s head would hit. The front edge of the bonnet also offered poor protection in almost every area tested.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Electronic stability control is standard equipment on the Juke, as is a seatbelt reminder for the driver and front seat passenger seating positions. Both of which met the Euro NCAP requirements. A driver-set speed limitation device did not qualify for assessment as it is available only as an option.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Nissan Juke 1.6 Acenta, LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2011
Kerb Weight 1172kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all Jukes of the specification tested
Class City and Supermini
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Juke remained stable in the frontal impact and rearward movement of the steering wheel movement was small. Measurements in the dummies' knees and femurs did not indicate a problem but, on both the driver and passenger side, structures in the dashboard were considered to present a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Accordingly, protection in this area was rated as marginal. Protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision was also rated as marginal.