Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
59% -
See More
![]()
86% -
See More
![]()
26% -
See More
![]()
26%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as optionBased on dummy readings in the front and side impact tests, the Scudo scored maximum points for its protection of both the 18 month and 3 year infants. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing seat, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contacts with the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear, and the system was not rewarded. The dangers of using a rearward-facing restraint in that seat without first disabling the airbag are clearly indicated inside the vehicle.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 7.8 Pts
Pelvis Impact 0.0 Pts
Leg Impact 0.0 Pts
The bumper provided poor protection to pedestrians' legs in all areas tested and scored no points. Assessment of the front edge of the bonnet was not appropriate owing to the shape and height of the vehicle. In those areas likely to be struck by the head of a child or that of an adult, protection was predominantly poor.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Applies To | Driver's seat | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
 |
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
FailElectronic stability control is available as an option but did not meet Euro NCAP's fitment requirements, and was not assessed. There is a seatbelt reminder system for the driver's seat and a driver-set speed limitation device is standard equipment on more than half of vehicles sold, and met Euro NCAP's technical requirements.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model FIAT Scudo 2.0 diesel, Combi, LHD
Body Type - 8/9 seater van
Year Of Publication 2012
Kerb Weight 1900kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Experts of the specification tested
Class Large MPV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Based on material presented by Peugeot and reviewed by Euro NCAP, the structure, equipment and safety performance of the Expert is identical to that of the FIAT Scudo, on which this assessment is based.
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Although the car tested had two separate front seats, the passenger airbag is wide enough to protect a third, centre occupant in cars fitted with a bench-style passenger seat. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and front passenger. For the outboard leg of the front passenger, the facia end posed a risk of injury but the dashboard was otherwise considered to provide good protection to those of other sizes and those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. No pole test was done as a head-protecting airbag did not meet fitment requirements. A geometric assessment of the front and rear seats revealed poor protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.