Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
94% -
See More
![]()
80% -
See More
![]()
69% -
See More
![]()
71%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as optionBased on dummy reading in the dynamic crash tests, maximum points were scored for protection of the 3 year infant. Forward movement of that dummy in the frontal impact test was not excessive and, in the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the car's interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not clear and the system was not rewarded. There is inadequate warning of the dangers of using a rearward-facing restraint without first disabling the airbag.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 16.6 Pts
Pelvis Impact 2.1 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper provided good protection for pedestrians' legs and scored maximum points. In most areas where a child's head might strike the bonnet, good protection was provided but the protection was predominantly poor in those areas likely to be struck by an adult's head.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | ASC | |
| Performance | ||
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.7% | meets ECE requirements |
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 1.3% | meets ECE requirements |
| Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.01 m | meets ECE requirements |
| Applies To | Front seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
 |
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
FailElectronic stability control is standard equipment. All Toledos have a driver and front passenger seatbelt reminder as standard. There is no rear seatbelt reminder or speed limitation device.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Car tested: Skoda Rapid 1.2TSI 'Ambition', LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2012
Kerb Weight 1093kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all Toledos of the specification tested
Class Small Family Car
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
The Seat Toledo has been scrutinised by Euro NCAP and the car is structurally identical to the Skoda Rapid and has the same interior fittings. Seat has informed Euro NCAP that the Toledo also has the same levels of safety equipment as the Rapid. Accordingly, Euro NCAP believes that the star rating of the Skoda Rapid can also be applied to the Seat Toledo
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. The car scored maximum points for its protection of the front passenger. Readings for both front seat dummies indicated good protection of the knees and femurs and it was demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be available to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Maximum points were scored for protection of the driver in the side barrier test. In the more severe side pole test, protection of most body regions was good and that of the chest was adequate. The seat and head restraint provided marginal protection against whiplash in the event of a rear-end collision.