Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
Adult Occupant
See More
85% -
Child Occupant
See More
73% -
Pedestrian
See More
79% -
Safety Assist
See More
64%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option- Not Available
-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
- Easy
Difficult
Safety critical- Not allowed
| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, the 1½ year dummy, sat in a rearward-facing restraint, indicated a marginal level of protection to the head and good protection to other parts of the body. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but high neck tension resulted in an adequate overall rating for protection of that age-group. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 16.5 Pts
Pelvis Impact 6.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The i20 provided good protection both to the leg and the pelvis, and scored maximum points in these tests. The bonnet offered predominantly good or adequate protection to the head, with some poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | Speed limiter |
| Speed Limit Information Function | N/A |
| Warning Function | Manually set |
| Speed Limitation Function | Manually set |
| System Name | MEB4 | |
| Performance | ||
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.26% | meets ECE requirements |
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 1% | meets ECE requirements |
| Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3 m | meets ECE requirements |
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Lane departure warning |
| Type | Lane Departure Warning |
| Operational From | 60 km/h |
| Warning | Audible & Visual |
| Performance | |
|
LDW Confirmation Test
|
Pass |
The i20 has electronic stability control as standard equipment. A seatbelt reminder is also provided as standard for all seating positions. A driver-set speed limiter and a lane departure warning system are both available as options but are expected to be fitted to most cars sold so were included in the assessment and met Euro NCAP's requirements.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Hyundai i20 1.2 GLS, LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2015
Kerb Weight 1100kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all i20s of the specification tested
Class City and Supermini
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Fitted to the vehicle as option
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
- Not Applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and front passenger. Hyundai showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different statures and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test the restraint systems provided adequate protection to the driver's chest and to the rear passenger's neck and chest, and good protection to other body regions. In both the side impact barrier test and the side pole test, dummy readings showed good protection for all critical body areas. However, during both tests, the rear edge of the curtain airbag was trapped by part of the interior trim so did not fully deploy as intended. This was penalised and the protection of the head was rated as adequate. Hyundai are investigating the cause of the unintended airbag deployment behaviour. Tests showed that good protection against whiplash injuries would be provided to front seat occupants. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated a marginal level of protection against whiplash injuries. The i20 does not have an autonomous emergency braking system.