Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
87% -
See More
![]()
91% -
See More
![]()
64% -
See More
![]()
78%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Seat
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
The Proace scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy in the full scale crash tests. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive and protection was good apart from marginally raised neck tension. In the side barrier impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 13.4 Pts
Pelvis Impact 0.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. Euro NCAP does not perform tests to the front edge of the bonnet for vehicles in this category. The protection offered to the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed, with test results ranging from good to poor.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | ESP | |
| Performance | ||
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.78% | meets ECE requirements |
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 1.72% | meets ECE requirements |
| Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.57 m | meets ECE requirements |
| Applies To | Driver's seat | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
 |
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
FailThe Proace has electronic stability control as standard equipment, together with a seatbelt reminder for the driver and passenger seats. A driver-set speed limiter is also standard equipment.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Peugeot Traveller 2.0 diesel, 'Navette', LHD
Body Type - Van
Year Of Publication 2015
Kerb Weight 1900kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - All Toyota Proaces
Class Business and Family Van
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
The Toyota Proace is identical to the Peugeot Traveller in all ways related to safety, including the fitment of safety equipment. Accordingly, the assessment of the Proace is based on tests conducted on the Peugeot Traveller.
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Toyota showed that a similar level of safety would be available to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Currently, the full width rigid barrier test is not done on vehicles in the Business and Family Van category. In the side barrier test, the Proace scored maximum points, with good protection of all body areas. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal chest protection but the protection of other body areas was rated as good. A geometric assessment indicated good whiplash protection for the front seat occupants but poor whiplash protection for those in the rear.