Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Seat Position | |||
---|---|---|---|
Front | 2nd row | ||
Passenger | Left | Right | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
The Ypsilon scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ and 3 year dummies in the full-scale crash tests. Both child dummies were sat in rearward-facing restraints. In the side barrier impact, both were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the lieklihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Ypsilon is designed could be correctly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 14.9 Pts
Pelvis Impact 2.4 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection provided to pedestrians' legs, with good results at all test locations. Protection of the pelvic region was more mixed, results ranging from poor to good. Test results on the bonnet surface showed predominantly adequate or marginal protection for the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded both along the base of the windscreen and along the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Applies To | Front seats | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
The Ypsilon has electronic stability control as standard, together with a seatbelt reminder for the front seats. A reminder system for the rear seats is available as an option, so it did not qualify for assessment. The Ypsilon does not have autonomos emergency braking, speed assistance or a lane assistance system.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Lancia New Ypsilon 1.2 Gold, LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2015
Kerb Weight 965kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Ypsilons of the specification tested
Class City and Supermini
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Fitted to the vehicle as option
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
- Not Applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Ypsilon remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. Lancia showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full width rigid barrier test, no points were scored. For the driver, parameters relating to head injury and neck bending indicated poor protection for both of these parts of the body, and marginal protection of the chest. Protection of the rear passenger dummy was poor for all critical body areas except the neck, protection of which was rated as weak. However, in the side impact barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good, and maximum points were scored. A side pole test was not performed in this assessment. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated good whiplash protection for the occupants of those seating positions. The Ypsilon does not have an autonomous emergency braking system to provide additional whiplash protection.
Note: Moments after the offset frontal barrier test, a fire started in the engine compartment, a consequence of the battery positive terminal shorting out and setting fire to brake fluid leaking from the reservoir. This is a rare occurrence: Lancia had not seen this phenomenon in any of their development tests and are not aware of any real-world cases. Nevertheless, the company has investigated the issue and are introducing a countermeasure into production in early December.