Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Seat Position | |||
---|---|---|---|
Front | 2nd row | ||
Passenger | Left | Right | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Both the 1½ and 3 year dummies were sat in rearward-facing seats, according to Maserati's recommendation. Based on the dummy readings from the dynamic tests, the car scored maximum points for its protection of both infants. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear. The risks of using a rearward-facing seat in the front passenger seat without first disabling the airbag are not permanently indicated in the car. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 14.8 Pts
Pelvis Impact 6.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs, with good results in all areas tested. The front edge of the bonnet also scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's tests. The bonnet provided protection to the head that was largely good or adequate, with poor results recorded at the base of the windscreen and along the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Speed Limitation Function | Manually Set |
System Name | ESC | |
Performance | ||
Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 6.152% | meets ECE requirements |
Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 2.422% | meets ECE requirements |
Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.34 m | meets ECE requirements |
Applies To | All seats | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
The Ghibli has electronic stability control as standard equipment, and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder is provided for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limitater is available and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of that type.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Maserati Ghibli Diesel, 3.0 TDS, LHD
Body Type - 5 door saloon
Year Of Publication 2013
Kerb Weight 1875kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all Ghiblis of the specification tested
Class Executive Car
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Fitted to the vehicle as option
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
- Not Applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Maserati showed that a similar level of protection would be available to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, the Ghibli scored maximum points, with good protection of all body regions. Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. The front seats and head restraints provided protection against whiplash injuries that was rated as marginal.