- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
92% -
See More
![]()
83% -
See More
![]()
75% -
See More
![]()
68%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult
Safety critical| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X1 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, neck tension and chest deceleration revealed, respectively, marginal and weak protection for those body areas in the 6 year dummy. Protection of the 10 year dummy was good, apart from marginal protection of the neck, and, in the side impact, was good for all critical body areas for both child dummies. The Levorg has an automatic system for disabling the front passenger airbag when, for example, a rearward-facing child restraint is used in that position. The system met Euro NCAP's requirements and was rewarded. All child restraints for which the Levorg is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 16.1 Pts
Pelvis Impact 4.5 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
| System Name | Eyesight | ||
| Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
| Operational From | 0 km/h | ||
| Additional Information | Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light | ||
| PERFORMANCE | | |||
| Autobrake Function | |||
| Avoidance | Mitigation | ||
|
Running Adult crossing from Farside
|
Collision avoided up to 50 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 55 km/h | |
|
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25%
|
Collision avoided up to 40 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h | |
|
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75%
|
Collision avoided up to 60 km/h | ||
|
Running Child from behind parked vehicles
|
Collision avoided up to 25 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 40 km/h | |
The bonnet provided good or adequate head protection over most of its surface, with some poorer results only along the front edge and on the stiff windscreen pillars. Protection provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs was mixed, ranging from weak to good, and the protection provided to the pelvis was good at all points tested. An autonomous emergency braking system capable of detecting pedestrians is standard equipment and tests showed good performance, with impacts avoided or mitigated in many scenarios.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Subaru Eyesight |
| Type | Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning |
| Operational From | 60 km/h |
| Warning | Audible and Visual |
| Performance | |
|
LKA Confirmation Test
|
Pass (5/5) |
|
LDW Confirmation Test
|
Pass |
| System Name | Eyesight | |||
| Type | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| Operational From | 1 km/h | |||
| Additional Information | Default On | |||
| Performance | | ||||
| Autobrake Function Only | Driver reacts to warning | |||
| Operational Speed | 1-200 km/h | 1-250 km/h | ||
| Approaching a stationary car | See AEB City | Crash avoided up to 80km/h. | ||
| Approaching a slower moving car | Crash avoided up to 70km/h. | Crash avoided up to 80km/h. | ||
| Following a car at short distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Mitigation | Mitigation | ||
| Following a car at long distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
The Levorg has a seatbelt reminder system as standard, covering the front and rear seats. A standard-fit lane assistance system warns the driver when the car is drifting over a lane marking and gently steers the car back into lane. The autonomous emergency braking system works at highway speeds and performed well in Euro NCAP's tests, with complete impact avoidance in some of the test scenarios.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Subaru Levorg 1.6 GT-S, LHD
Body Type - 5 door estate
Year Of Publication 2016
Kerb Weight 1574kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Subaru Levorgs
Class Small Family Car
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings showed good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Subaru showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Protection of the driver's chest was rated as marginal, owing to dummy readings of chest compression. In the full width rigid barrier test, protection was good except for the chest of the front seat driver, protection of which was adequate and the chest of the rear seat passenger, protection of which was marginal. In the side impact barrier test the Levorg scored maximum points with good protection of all critical body regions. In the more severe side pole impact, the Levorg provided good protection to all body regions except the chest, protection of which was adequate. Tests showed that the whiplash protection provided by the front seats and head restraints was good in the event of a rear end collision and a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated good protection there also. Increased whiplash protection is provided by an autonomous emergency braking system. The system performed well in tests at the low speeds typical of city driving at which many whiplash accidents occur.