Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
88% -
See More
![]()
79% -
See More
![]()
61% -
See More
![]()
81%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult
Safety critical| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Based on dummy result in the dynamic tests, the Captur scored maximum points for its protection of the 18 month dummy. Both child dummies were seated in rearward-facing restraints. The head of the 3 year dummy was found to have made contact with the C-pillar of the vehicle, and no points were awarded for protection of the head. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their restraints, minimising the likelihood of dangerous head contact with parts of the car interior. The passenger airbag could be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information was provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All types of child restraints could be properly installed in the seating positions designed to take them.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 13.4 Pts
Pelvis Impact 2.7 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. Protection of the head was predominantly adequate, both in those areas likely to be struck by an adult and those where a child's head might strike.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Speed Limitation Function | Manually Set |
| System Name | ESP | |
| Performance | ||
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 3.095% | meets ECE requirements |
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 6.666% | meets ECE requirements |
| Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.8 m | meets ECE requirements |
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
Electronic stability control is standard and passed Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder system is also standard for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limitation device is also available and met Euro NCAP's requirements.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Renault CAPTUR 1.0 'Zen', LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2013
Kerb Weight 1180kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all CAPTURs of the specification tested
Class City and Supermini
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of all body regions of the driver dummy and all but the chest of the passenger dummy, protection of which was adequate. Renault showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. However, in the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated weak protection of the chest and marginal protection of the abdomen. The seat and head restraint provided marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear end impact.