- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
Adult Occupant
See More
45% -
Child Occupant
See More
16% -
Vulnerable Road Users
See More
47% -
Safety Assist
See More
7%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option- Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
- Easy
Difficult
Safety critical- Not allowed
| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, dummy readings showed poor protection of the head and neck for both the 6 and 10 year children. Chest decelerations indicated weak protection of the chest of the 10 year old. In the side barrier test, the head of the 6 year old dummy was not properly contained within the protective side of the restraint and dummy readings indicated poor protection of this critical body area, also causing high injury risks to the 10 year old due to head-to-head contact. Forces in the neck of the 10 year dummy indicated poor protection for that body areas. Overall, the Panda scored no points in the dynamic tests for its protection of children. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not clear and the system was not rewarded. The Panda has ISOFIX but no i-Size anchorages in the rear outboard seats. Child restraints could be properly installed and accommodated in the Panda, except for the optional rear centre seating position.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 12.9 Pts
Pelvis Impact 5.6 Pts
Leg Impact 4.5 Pts
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly adequate or marginal on the surface of the bonnet. However, protection was poor along the windscreen base and on the stiff windscreen pillars. Protection of pedestrians' legs was predominantly marginal but protection of the pelvis was at least adequate.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Applies To | Not available | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
| Occupant Detection | |
|
|
|
|||
The Panda has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. However, the system did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements for the rear and only the front-seat system scored. The Panda is not equipped with any other driver-assistance system which scores in Euro NCAP's rating scheme.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model FIAT Panda Easy 1.2 Fire, LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2018
Kerb Weight 940kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Pandas
Class City and Supermini
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
- Not available
- Not applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
| Variant | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | |
| All Panda variants |  |
|
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Panda remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings of driver chest compression indicated weak protection of this body area. Test results showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. FIAT showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, dummy readings indicated weak protection of the head and neck. Protection of the chest was marginal. Dummy readings of rear passenger chest compression led to a low score for this body region, and this was further penalised because of high shoulder belt loads, leading to the protection being rated as poor. Protection of the passenger's neck was also weak. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on readings of rib compression, with other critical body regions being well protected. No pole test was conducted. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection. The Panda is not equipped with an autonomous emergency braking system.