- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
94% -
See More
![]()
87% -
See More
![]()
72% -
See More
![]()
73%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
-
Approaching a stationary car: Left Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: No Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: Right Offset
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult
Safety critical| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, protection of both dummies was good or adequate for all critical body areas. In the side barrier test, protection was good for all areas and maximum points were scored. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Evoque is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 19.2 Pts
Pelvis Impact 3.7 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
| System Name | Emergency Braking | ||
| Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
| Operational From | 5 km/h | ||
| PERFORMANCE | | |||
- Day time
- Night time
Day time
-
Adult crossing the road
-
Child running from behind parked vehicles
-
Adult along the roadside
Night time
-
Adult crossing the road
-
Adult along the roadside
-
Approaching a crossing cyclist
-
Cyclist along the roadside
The Evoque has an 'active' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators raise the bonnet surface to provide greater clearance to hard structures in the engine compartment. In addition, an airbag is deployed to provide additional protection. Land Rover showed that the system worked for a variety of statures and across a range of speeds, so the vehicle was tested with the bonnet in the raised, deployed position. Test results were predominantly good or adequate. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed. The AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists. Tests showed adequate performance with pedestrians and marginal performance when detecting cyclists.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | Adaptive Speed Limiter |
| Speed Limit Information Function | N/A |
| Speed Control Function | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Applies To | Not available | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
| Occupant Detection | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Lane Keep Assist |
| Type | LKA (including LDW) and ELK |
| Operational From | 30 km/h |
| Performance | |
| Emergency Lane Keeping | |
| Lane Keep Assist | |
| Human Machine Interface | |
| System Name | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
| Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
| Operational From | 5 km/h | |||
| Additional Information | Supplementary warning | |||
- Autobrake function only
- Driver reacts to warning
Autobrake function only
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a braking car
Driver reacts to warning
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a braking car
The AEB system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. The Evoque also has, as standard: a lane support system which helps the driver to avoid drifting out of lane and can also help in some, more critical situations; a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats; and a driver-set speed assistance system. A speed limit recognition system is available but did not form part of this assessment as it is an option.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Range Rover Evoque R Dynamic 'S', 2.0 diesel, RHD
Body Type - 5 door SUV
Year Of Publication 2019
Kerb Weight 1956kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Evoques incl. PHEV (from 2021)
Class Small SUV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Evoque remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both driver and passenger. Land Rover showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection was good for all critical body areas of the passenger. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection was good or adequate for the driver and the rear passenger. In the side barrier test, protection was good for all critical body areas and maximum points were scored. Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other parts of the body was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end impact. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The Evoque has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system which scored maximum points in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur.