- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
-
Approaching a stationary car: Left Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: No Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: Right Offset
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Seat Position | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Front | 2nd row | |||
Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
In the frontal test, protection of all critical body areas was good for both dummies, apart from the neck of the 10 year dummy, protection of which was marginal. In the side barrier impact, all critical body areas were well protected for both dummies and the Octavia scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Octavia is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 16.0 Pts
Pelvis Impact 4.8 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
System Name | Front Assist | ||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
Operational From | 5 km/h | ||
PERFORMANCE | |
-
Approaching a crossing cyclist
-
Cyclist along the roadside
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and protection of the pelvis was also generally good. The Octavia's AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests, the system's response to cyclists was good and to pedestrians was adequate, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most cases.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
System Name | Speedlimiter |
Speed Limit Information Function | N/A |
Speed Control Function | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Applies To | All Seats | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Occupant Detection | |||
|
System Name | Lane Assist |
Type | ELK + LKA (including LDW) |
Operational From | 60 km/h |
Performance | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Human Machine Interface |
System Name | Front Assist | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operational From | 5 km/h | |||
Additional Information | Supplementary warning |
The Octavia has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats. The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds. A driver-set speed limiter helps the driver not to over-speed while a lane support system helps prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane, as well as intervening more aggressively in some critical situations.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Škoda Octavia Combi 1.5 TSI "Ambition", LHD
Body Type - 5 door estate
Year Of Publication 2019
Kerb Weight 1313kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Octavias including PHEV
Class Large Family Car
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
- Not available
- Not applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door estate* 5 door hatchback |
1.0, 1.5*, 2.0 litre petrol | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door estate 5 door hatchback |
1.0, 1.5 litre petrol mHEV | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door estate 5 door hatchback |
1.5 CNG | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door estate 5 door hatchback |
2.0 diesel | 4 x 2 4 x 4 |
||
5 door estate 5 door hatchback |
1.4 PHEV | 4 x 2 |
* Tested variant
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Octavia remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Škoda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear passenger was marginal but, otherwise, protection was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in this test. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of rib compression, with good protection of other parts of the body. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur.