- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
-
Approaching a stationary car: Left Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: No Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: Right Offset
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Seat Position | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Front | 2nd row | |||
Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, protection of all critical body areas was good apart from the neck of the 10-year child, for which dummy readings of neck forces indicated marginal protection. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical parts of the body was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 19.0 Pts
Pelvis Impact 3.6 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
System Name | Audi Pre-Sense Front | ||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
Operational From | 10 km/h | ||
PERFORMANCE | |
-
Approaching a crossing cyclist
-
Cyclist along the roadside
--pedestrianCommentEN--
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
System Name | Speed Limiter |
Speed Limit Information Function | N/A (option) |
Speed Control Function | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Applies To | Not available | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Occupant Detection | |||
|
System Name | Active Lane Departure Warning |
Type | LKA and ELK |
Operational From | 65 km/h |
Performance | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Human Machine Interface |
System Name | Audi Pre-Sense Front | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operational From | 10 km/h | |||
Additional Information | Supplementary warning and Restraint activation |
The AEB system performed well in tests of its functionality at the highway speeds. The standard-fit speed assistance system consists of a driver-set speed limiter. A more advanced system is available as an option, not included in this assessment, which recognises the local speed limit and presents the information to the driver. A seatbelt reminder is standard for front and rear seats. The lane support system helps the driver to keep the car from drifting out of lane but is also able, in some circumstances, to intervene in emergency situations.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Audi A6 40 TDI Sportline 4x2, LHD
Body Type - 4 door saloon
Year Of Publication 2018
Kerb Weight 1682kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all A7s including PHEV
Class Executive Car
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
- Not available
- Not applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door hatchback | 2.0 petrol | 40 TFSI, 45TFSI, 50 TFSI | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door hatchback | 2.0 petrol |
45 TFSI quattro 50 TFSI quattro |
4 x 4 | ||
5 door hatchback | 2.0 petrol PHEV |
55 TFSI e quattro |
4 x 4 | ||
5 door hatchback | 3.0 petrol | 55 TFSI quattro | 4 x 4 | ||
5 door hatchback | 2.0 diesel | 40 TDI | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door hatchback | 2.0 diesel | 40 TDI quattro | 4 x 4 | ||
5 door hatchback | 3.0 petrol | A6 55 TFSI quattro | 4 x 4 | ||
5 door hatchback | 2.0 diesel | A6 Avant 40 TDI | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door hatchback | 2.0 diesel | A6 Avant 40 TDI quattro | 4 x 4 | ||
5 door hatchback | 3.0 diesel |
45 TDI quattro 50 TDI quattro |
4 x 4 | ||
5 door hatchback | 3.0 diesel | S7 55 TDI quattro | 4 x 4 |
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
The Audi A7 is identical to the A6 but has a 'Sportback' bodystyle. Some additional tests and checks have been done to ensure that the rating of the A6, tested in 2018, applies also to the A7, including the plug-in hybrid (PHEV) variant.
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings showed good protection for the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Audi showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, seatbelt pre-tensioners and load-limiters in the front and rear seats ensured adequate protection for the chest. Protection of other critical body areas was good. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of lateral rib compression. In an additional test done on the heavier PHEV variant, chest protection was rated as weak. Protection of other parts of the body was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.