Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Seat Position | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Front | 2nd row | |||
Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Based on dummy readings, the C4 Picasso/SpaceTourer scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year dummy in the dynamic tests. Both dummies were sat in rearward-facing restraints for the impact tests. In the front impact, this ensured good protection from potential contact with the car interior. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their restraints, minimising the likelihood of dangerous head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. The system provides clear information to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and was rewarded. All of the types of child restraints for which the car is designed could be installed in the vehicle without any problems.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 15.3 Pts
Pelvis Impact 3.3 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The C4 Picasso/SpaceTourer scored maximum points for the protection provided by the bumper to pedestrians' legs. The front edge of the bonnet was also good in places but provided mostly marginal protection to the pelvis area. The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was poor along the base of the windscreen and on the windscreen pillars but was otherwise largely good or adequate.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Speed Limitation Function | Manually Set |
System Name | ESC | |
Performance | ||
Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.427% | meets ECE requirements |
Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 1.924% | meets ECE requirements |
Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.95 m | meets ECE requirements |
Applies To | All seats | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
Electronic stability control is standard equipment and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limitation device is standard equipment and met the test requirements for this type of system.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Citroen C4 Picasso DV6 Confort, LHD
Body Type - 5 door MPV
Year Of Publication 2013
Kerb Weight 1405kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all C4 Picassos of the specification tested
Class Small MPV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Fitted to the vehicle as option
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
- Not Applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
From May 2018, the Citröen C4 Picasso is known as the Citröen C4 SpaceTourer. The vehicle is unchanged and the 2013 remains valid. From crash data presented by Citröen, Euro NCAP is satisfied that a similar level of protection is offered by the seven-seat Citröen Grand C4 Picasso/SpaceTourer.
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Citroën showed that a similar level of protection would be available to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier impact, representing a car striking the side of the vehicle, the C4 Picasso/SpaceTourer scored maximum points. However, in the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated weak protection of the chest area. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.