- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
91% -
See More
![]()
81% -
See More
![]()
58% -
See More
![]()
68%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
-
Approaching a stationary car: Left Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: No Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: Right Offset
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
outboard *
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
| Seat Position | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | 3rd row | ||||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | Left | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
 |
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
With the exception of the neck of the 6 year dummy, protection of which was adequate, dummy results in both the frontal offset and the side barrier impacts showed good protection for all critical body areas for the 6 and 10 year children. The front passenger airbag can be deactivated to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the vehicle is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car. However, ISOFIX/i-Size anchorages are optional in the second-row centre seating position in some countries and buyers should ensure they order these if they are needed. The optional third row seats are not suitable for child restraints.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 12.7 Pts
Pelvis Impact 6.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
| System Name | Active Safety Brake | ||
| Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
| Operational From | 10 km/h | ||
| PERFORMANCE | | |||
- Day time
- Night time
Day time
-
Adult crossing the road
-
Child running from behind parked vehicles
-
Adult along the roadside
Night time
-
Adult crossing the road
-
Adult along the roadside
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly adequate or marginal, with poor results recorded along the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and protection of the pelvis was also good at all test locations. The AEB system performed well in some tests of its reaction to pedestrians but its performance overall was rated as marginal. The system does not respond to faster-moving road-users like cyclists.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | SLIF & ISA |
| Speed Limit Information Function | Camera based |
| Speed Control Function | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Applies To | Not available | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
| Occupant Detection | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Lane Keeping Assist |
| Type | LKA and ELK |
| Operational From | 60 km/h |
| Performance | |
| Emergency Lane Keeping | |
| Lane Keep Assist | |
| Human Machine Interface | |
| System Name | Active Safety Brake | |||
| Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
| Operational From | 5 km/h | |||
- Autobrake function only
- Driver reacts to warning
Autobrake function only
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a braking car
Driver reacts to warning
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a braking car
The AEB system gave marginal performance when tested at highway speeds. The Berlingo has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats but not for the optional third-row seats. A speed assistance system is also standard and informs the driver of the local speed limit, allowing the driver to set the limiter appropriately. A lane keeping assist system helps prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical emergency situations.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Peugeot Rifter BlueHDi 100 Allure, LHD
Body Type - 5 door MPV
Year Of Publication 2018
Kerb Weight 1510kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Berlingos, including ë-Berlingo
Class Small MPV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
The rating of the Citroën Berlingo is based on tests done on the Peugeot Rifter, with which it is identical apart from some visual features which affect only pedestrian impact test performance. Data reviewed by Euro NCAP demonstrates that the results of all tests performed on the Rifter are valid also for Berlingo.
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings showed good protection for the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. It was demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver dummy was marginal for the chest and neck and good for other critical body areas. Protection of the rear passenger was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points. Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other critical body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.