- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
76% -
See More
![]()
60% -
See More
![]()
59% -
See More
![]()
29%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
outboard *
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
| Seat Position | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | 3rd row | ||||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | Left | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
 |
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) |  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, readings of neck tension indicated poor protection of this part of the body for the 10-year dummy and marginal protection for the 6-year dummy. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled in cars fitted with an optional cut-off switch, to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. As this switch is not standard equipment, no points are awarded in this assessment and the installation check of rearward-facing restraints is deemed a fail. ISOFIX and i-Size compatible anchorages are available only on the second row outboard seats.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 15.9 Pts
Pelvis Impact 4.3 Pts
Leg Impact 4.8 Pts
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly adequate or marginal. Protection of pedestrians' legs by the bumper was mostly good but weak in places, and that of the pelvis was also generally good but with some poor results.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | ASLD (Adjustable Speed Limiting Device) |
| Speed Limit Information Function | N/A |
| Warning Function | Manually set |
| Speed Limitation Function | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Applies To | Front seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
The C-MAX has a seatbelt reminder system for the front seats only. It also has, as standard, a driver-set speed limiter.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Ford Grand C-MAX 1.5 diesel 'Titanium', LHD
Body Type - 5 door MPV
Year Of Publication 2017
Kerb Weight 1606kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - WF0WXXGCEWHE77742
Class Small MPV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
| Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | |||
| 5 door MPV | 1.5 diesel | 4 x 2 |  |
|
| 5 door MPV | 2.0 diesel | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door MPV | 1.0 petrol | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door MPV | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door MPV | 1.6 petrol | 4 x 2 | |
|
Ford Grand C-MAX, 1.5 diesel was tested
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
The Ford Grand C-MAX and the Ford Compact C-MAX are identical apart from the way the rear doors operate. Euro NCAP tested the heavier Grand C-MAX and the results of those tests are used in this assessment.
Share
The passenger compartment of the C-MAX remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Ford demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Protection was good for all critical body areas of the passenger dummy in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier test, the pelvis of the driver dummy slipped beneath the lap section of the seatbelt and protection of this area was rated as poor. Dummy readings of chest compression indicated marginal protection. For the rear passenger dummy, a combination of chest compression and high shoulder belt load indicated poor chest protection, and that of the neck was rated as marginal. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the C-MAX scored maximum points in this test. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of rib compression. In that test, the sliding door unlatched at the front, creating a gap between the door and the car body, and the score was penalised for this. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. Cars from VIN WF0WXXGCEWHE77742 have a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. In tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused, the system performed adequately.