Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
94% -
See More
![]()
85% -
See More
![]()
62% -
See More
![]()
70%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult
Safety critical| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the Tourneo Connect scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year infant. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the car interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car,
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 16.2 Pts
Pelvis Impact 0.3 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet was poor in most of the areas tested. The bonnet surface provided good or adequate protection in most areas, apart from the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Speed Limitation Function | Manually Set |
| System Name | ESP | |
| Performance | ||
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 2.109% | meets ECE requirements |
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 1.632% | meets ECE requirements |
| Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.4 m | meets ECE requirements |
| Applies To | Front seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
 |
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
The Tourneo Connect has electronic stability control as standard and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A driver-set speed-limitation device is available and got full marks for systems of that type. A seatbelt reminder is provided for the front seats but is not available for the rear seats.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Ford Tourneo Connect 1.6 'Trend', LHD
Body Type - 5 door MPV
Year Of Publication 2013
Kerb Weight 1612kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all Tourneo Connects of the specification tested
Class Small MPV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test the Tourneo Connect scored maximum points with good protection of all body regions. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. The front seats and head restraints provided good protection against whiplash in the event of a rear-end collision.