- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
84% -
See More
![]()
82% -
See More
![]()
69% -
See More
![]()
79%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
-
![]()
Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier![]()
-
![]()
Full Width Rigid Barrier
-
![]()
Side Mobile Barrier
![]()
Side Pole
-
![]()
Far-Side Excursion
Occupant Interaction![]()
Occupant Interaction
Rear Seat
Front Seat
| Rescue Sheet |
Available, ISO compliant
|
|||
| Advanced eCall | Available | |||
| Multi Collision Brake | Available | |||
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
outboard *
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult| Seat Position | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | 3rd row | ||||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | Left | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) |  |
|
|
|
 |
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good for both the 6 and 10 year dummies, apart from the neck of the 10 year dummy, protection of which was adequate. The front passenger airbag can be switched off to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. There was insufficient space in the optional third-row seats to install some child restraints. Otherwise, the car could accommodate the restraints for which it is designed.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 15.7 Pts
Pelvis Impact 4.7 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
| System Name | Front Assist | ||
| Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
| Operational From | 4 km/h | ||
| PERFORMANCE | | |||
- Day time
- Night time
Day time
-
Vehicle reversing into standing pedestrian
-
Pedestrian crossing a road into which a car is turning
-
Adult crossing the road
-
Child running from behind parked vehicles
-
Adult along the roadside
Night time
-
Adult crossing the road
-
Adult along the roadside
-
Cyclist from nearside, obstructed view
-
Approaching a crossing cyclist
-
Cyclist along the roadside
The protection offered by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrian's legs at most test positions. However, protection of the pelvis was mixed, with areas of good and poor protection. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system detects vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests of the system's response to such road-users, performance was rated as adequate.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | Speed Limiter |
| Speed Control Function | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Applies To | Front and rear seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
| Occupant Detection | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Driver Alert System |
| Type | Steering input |
| Operational From | 60 km/h |
| System Name | Lane Assist |
| Type | LKA and ELK |
| Operational From | 60 km/h |
| Performance | |
| Emergency Lane Keeping | |
| Lane Keep Assist | |
| Human Machine Interface | |
| System Name | Front assist | |||
| Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
| Operational From | 5 km/h | |||
| Sensor Used | camera and radar | |||
- Autobrake function only
- Driver reacts to warning
Autobrake function only
-
Car turning across the path of an oncoming car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a braking car
Driver reacts to warning
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a braking car
--safetyAssistCommentEN--
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Volkswagen Caddy 2.0 diesel Kombi 'Life' 4x2, LHD
Body Type - 5 door MPV
Year Of Publication 2021
Kerb Weight 1767kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Tourneo Connects
Class Small MPV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
| Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | ||||
| 5 door MPV | 2.0 diesel | Tourneo Connect 55 kW | 4 x 2 |  |
|
| 5 door MPV | 2.0 diesel | Tourneo Connect 75 kW | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door MPV | 2.0 diesel | Tourneo Connect 90 kW | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door MPV | 1.5 petrol | Tourneo Connect 84 kW | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door MPV | 1.5 CNG | Tourneo Connect 96 kW | 4 x 2 | |
|
Tested variant: VW Caddy 75 kW, TDI
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a twin to the Volkswagen Caddy, tested by Euro NCAP in 2021. Where minor differences exist, data has been reviewed to confirm that the Tourneo Connect performs at least as well as the Caddy and, accordingly, the rating is carried over here.
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Volkswagen showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be an aggressive impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of the passenger was rated as marginal, based on readings of chest compression. All other critical body areas were rated as good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good and maximum points were scored. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was marginal but that of other critical body areas was good. Limitation of occupant excursion - the extent to which the occupant is flung to the other side of the vehicle in a side impact - was rated as marginal. A centre airbag protects against occupant to occupant injuries in side impacts. The airbag performed well in Euro NCAP's tests, with good protection of the dummies' heads. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injures in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. An advanced eCall system automatically alerts the emergency services in the event of a collision, and multi-collision braking to prevent secondary impacts.