Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
84% -
See More
![]()
84% -
See More
![]()
74% -
See More
![]()
56%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Seat
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) |  |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
The Tourneo Courier scored maximum points in the dynamic tests for its protection of the 1½ year infant. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but chest loads indicated only fair protection of this body region. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of head contact with parts of the car interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information regarding the status of the airbag is provided to the driver and the system was rewarded. The rear outboard seats are i-Size compatible. All the child restraints for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car except for the group 0+ semi-universal restraint in the front passenger seat. With the seat in the recommended position (furthest rearward), the In this case, the buckle tongue stop interferes with the restraint lock-off.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 16.3 Pts
Pelvis Impact 4.6 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The protection offered by the bumper was good in all areas tested, while that of the front edge of the bonnet was more mixed. The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was generally good on the centre part of the bonnet surface and on the windscreen but was poor around the bottom of the screen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | ESP | |
| Performance | ||
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
The Tourneo Courier is equipped with electronic stablity control as standard equipment. A seatbelt reminder is also standard for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limitation device is an option. As most cars are expected to be equipped with it, the system was assessed and met Euro NCAP's requirements for manually-set speed limiters. The Tourneo Courier does not have lane support or autonomous braking.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Ford Tourneo Courier 1.5 diesel 'Trend', LHD
Body Type -
Year Of Publication 2014
Kerb Weight 1329kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all Tourneo Couriers of the specification tested
Class City and Supermini
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier impact, the Tourneo Courier scored maximum points, with good protection of all body areas. Even in the more severe side pole test, protection was good in all areas except the chest, protection of which was adequate. Protection against whiplash injury was marginal for both the front and rear seating positions.