- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
91% -
See More
![]()
93% -
See More
![]()
69% -
See More
![]()
90%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
-
![]()
Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier![]()
-
![]()
Full Width Rigid Barrier
-
![]()
Side Mobile Barrier
![]()
Side Pole
-
![]()
Far-Side Excursion
Occupant Interaction![]()
Occupant Interaction
Rear Seat
Front Seat
| Rescue Sheet |
Available, ISO compliant
|
|||
| Advanced eCall | Available | |||
| Multi Collision Brake | Not available | |||
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult
Safety critical| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |
|
 |
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate, for both the 6 and 10 year dummy. In the side barrier impact, protection of all body areas was good and maximum points were scored. The front passenger airbag is automatically disabled when a rearward-facing child restraint is put in that seating position. Tests showed that the system worked robustly and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 14.5 Pts
Pelvis Impact 3.8 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
| System Name | Active Brake Assist | ||
| Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
| PERFORMANCE | | |||
- Day time
- Night time
Day time
-
Vehicle reversing into standing pedestrian
-
Pedestrian crossing a road into which a car is turning
-
Adult crossing the road
-
Child running from behind parked vehicles
-
Adult along the roadside
Night time
-
Adult crossing the road
-
Adult along the roadside
-
Cyclist from nearside, obstructed view
-
Approaching a crossing cyclist
-
Cyclist along the roadside
The protection offered by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was largely good or adequate, but with some areas which were marginal or weak performance, and poor results were recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test locations but protection of the pelvis was mixed. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system can detect vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system performance was adequate while its response to cyclists was rated as good.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | Speed Limit Assist |
| Speed Limit Information Function | Camera based, subsigns supported |
| Speed Control Function | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Applies To | Front and rear seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
| Occupant Detection | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Attention Assist |
| Type | Steering input |
| Operational From | 0 km/h |
| System Name | Active Lane Keeping Assist |
| Type | LKA and ELK |
| Operational From | 65 km/h |
| Performance | |
| Emergency Lane Keeping | |
| Lane Keep Assist | |
| Human Machine Interface | |
| System Name | Active Brake Assist | |||
| Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
| Operational From | 8 km/h | |||
| Sensor Used | camera and radar | |||
- Autobrake function only
- Driver reacts to warning
Autobrake function only
-
Car turning across the path of an oncoming car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a braking car
Driver reacts to warning
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a braking car
The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles, with impacts avoided or mitigated in most test scenarios. A seatbelt reminder system is standard and the car is equipped with Driver Attention Warning, which monitors steering inputs and issues a warning when a pattern characteristic of drowsy or impaired driving is detected. A camera-based speed limit system detects the local limit and provides the information to the driver, allowing the limiter to be set accordingly. If the car is drifting out of lane, a camera-based system gently corrects the vehicle’s path. The system also intervenes in some more critical situations, to avoid road departure for example.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Mercedes-Benz T160 'Style', LHD
Body Type - 5 door MPV
Year Of Publication 2022
Kerb Weight 1544kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Citan Tourers, including e-Citan Tourer
Class Small MPV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
| Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | ||||
| 5 door MPV | 1.3 Petrol | Citan Tourer 113 | 4 x 2 |  |
|
| 5 door MPV | 1.3 Petrol | Citan Tourer 110 | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door MPV | 1.5 Diesel | Citan Tourer 112 CDI | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door MPV | 1.5 Diesel | Citan Tourer 110 CDI | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door MPV | Electric | e-Citan Tourer | 4 x 2 | |
|
Tested variant: Mercedes-Benz T 160
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
The Citan Tourer is identical to the Mercedes-Benz T-Class in terms of safety performance. Accordingly, the tests performed on the T-Class and the electric EQT are used for this rating of the Citan Tourer and e-Citan Tourer.
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger but a small penalty was incurred for structures in the dashboard on the driver’s side which might lead to a reduced level of protection to those of different sizes or sitting in a different position. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the vehicle would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full width rigid-barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good for the driver and at least adequate for the rear seat passenger. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and maximum points were scored. In the more severe side pole impact, protection was good or adequate. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The T-Class has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts and this performed well in Euro NCAP's test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Citan Tourer has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car is not equipped a system which applies the brakes after an impact to avoid secondary collisions.