How safe is your car ?

Select one or more vehicles among the following possibilities.

OR
OR
All results & rewards
Menu
2013 Info

Mitsubishi Space Star / Mirage

City and Supermini
Rating Expired Icon Rating Expired

Share this on:
Publication: Sep 2013

Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment

Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment

text a changé
  • Adult Occupant

    90%
    See More
  • Child Occupant

    72%
    See More
  • Pedestrian

    73%
    See More
  • Safety Assist

    55%
    See More
Total 32.7 Pts / 90%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier
14.1 Pts
Passenger
Driver
Whiplash Rear Impact
3.0 Pts
Front Seat
Lateral Impact
15.5 Pts
Car
Pole

Comments
Total 35.3 Pts / 72%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Crash Test Performance 22.6 Pts
18 months old child
10.8 Pts
Tested restraint (Fit): Britax Römer Duo Plus ISOFIX
Adequate
36 months old child
11.8 Pts
Tested restraint (Fit): Britax Römer Duo Plus ISOFIX
Adequate

Safety Features 3.0 Pts
Front
Passenger
2nd row
outboard
Isofix
i-Size
Integrated CRS
  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
  • Not Available
CRS Installation Check 9.8 Pts
crs
Installation
  • Easy
  • Difficult
  • Safety critical
  • Not allowed
Seat Position
Front 2nd row
Passenger Left center Right
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt)
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt)
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX)
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt)
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX)
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX)
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX)
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX)
  • Easy
  • Difficult
  • Safety critical
  • Not allowed
Detailed Test Results
Comments
Total 26.3 Pts / 73%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
VRU Impact Protection
26.3 Pts
VRU Impact Protection

Head Impact 16.5 Pts

Pelvis Impact 3.8 Pts

Leg Impact 6.0 Pts


Comments
Total 5.0 Pts / 55%
  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor
Speed Assistance 0 Pts
Electronic Stability Control 3 Pts
System Name ASC
Performance
Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s 3.7% meets ECE requirements
Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s 1.151% meets ECE requirements
Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s 3.03 m meets ECE requirements
Seatbelt Reminder 2.0 Pts
Applies To Front seats
Warning Driver Seat Front Passenger(s) Rear Passenger(s)
Visual
Audible
  • Pass
  • Fail
  • Not available
Lane Support 0 Pts
AEB Inter-Urban 0 Pts
Comments
  • Specifications
  • Safety Equipment
  • Videos
  • Rating Validity

Specifications

Tested Model Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2, RHD

Body Type - 5 door hatchback

Year Of Publication 2013

Kerb Weight 860kg

VIN From Which Rating Applies - Cars from 1st September 2013

Class City and Supermini

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION
Front Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Belt Pretensioner
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Belt Loadlimiter
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Knee Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
LATERAL CRASH PROTECTION
Side Head Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Side Chest Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Side Pelvis Airbag
Driver
Passenger
Rear
CHILD PROTECTION
Isofix/i-Size
Driver
Passenger
Rear
Airbag cut-off switch
Driver
Passenger
Rear
SAFETY ASSIST
Seatbelt Reminder
Driver
Passenger
Rear
OTHER SAFETY SYSTEMS
ESC
ESC
AEB City
AEB City
AEB Interurban
AEB Interurban
Speed Assistance
Speed Assistance
Lane Assist System
Lane Assist System

Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as option
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
  • Not Available
  • Not Applicable

Videos

Rating Validity

Annual Reviews and Facelifts

Date
Event
Outcome
September 2013
Rating Published
2013
September 2014
Annual Review
2013
September 2015
Annual Review
2013
December 2015
Facelift Review
2013
December 2016
Annual Review
2013
September 2017
Annual Review
2013
September 2018
Annual Review
2013
January 2020
Rating Expired
2013

Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment



Share

Subscribe for our latest news