Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
75% -
See More
![]()
80% -
See More
![]()
60% -
See More
![]()
38%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Seat
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
 |
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Based on dummy readings in the crash tests, the e-NV200 Evalia scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year infant. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but the dummy recorded marginally high neck forces. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag does not meet Euro NCAP's requirements. All of the restraint types for which the vehicle is designed could be properly installed and accommodated, apart from the group 2/3 universal restraint in the rear centre seat.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 14.5 Pts
Pelvis Impact 1.9 Pts
Leg Impact 5.2 Pts
The bumper provided predominantly good or adequate protection to pedestrians' legs. The front edge of the bonnet was predominantly poor. The protection provided by the bonnet surface to the head of a struck pedestrian was mainly adequate or marginal but some poor values were recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Speed Limitation Function | Manually Set |
| System Name | VDC | |
| Performance | ||
| Applies To | Front seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
 |
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
Electronic stability control is standard equipment. A seatbelt reminder is provided for the front seats but not for the rear. A driver-set speed limitation device is available as an option but the indication of set speed can be over-ridden by other information and did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements. The e-NV200 Evalia is not equipped with a lane departure warning system or autonomous braking.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Nissan e-NV200 Evalia Electric Motor Ludo Combi, LHD
Body Type - 5 door MPV
Year Of Publication 2014
Kerb Weight 1641kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all Evalia EV's of the specification tested
Class Small MPV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the e-NV200 Evalia remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger but the underside of the steering column and the facia could present a risk to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, protection of all body regions was good, except that of the chest which was adequate. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib deflection indicated marginal protection of the chest. Protection against whiplash injuries in the a event of a rear-end collision was rated as marginal for both the front and rear seats.