- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
86% -
See More
![]()
85% -
See More
![]()
67% -
See More
![]()
58%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult
Safety critical| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | |
|
 |
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X1 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the offset frontal impact, protection of the 10 year dummy's chest and neck was adequate and that of the head was good. Dummy readings of chest deceleration indicated marginal protection of the 6 year old's chest, with good protection of the head and neck. The 3008 provided good protection to all critical body areas of both dummies in the side barrier test. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the 3008 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the vehicle. A check of the 5008 showed that all suitable restraints could be properly installed there also, and the score for child occupant protection is the same as the 3008.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 16.2 Pts
Pelvis Impact 6.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The 3008 provided good protection to the pelvis and to pedestrians' legs, with maximum points scored for these parts of the assessment. The pedestrian-detecting autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests but the results of this part of the assessment are not included as the system is not standard on every grade.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | Speed Limit Recognition and Recommendation |
| Speed Limit Information Function | Camera based, subsigns supported |
| Warning Function | System advised |
| Speed Limitation Function | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Lane Departure Warning |
| Type | Lane Departure Warning |
| Operational From | 70 km/h |
| Warning | Audible and Visual |
| Performance | |
|
LDW Confirmation Test
|
Pass |
A seatbelt reminder system is standard for the front and rear seats. A standard camera-based speed assistance system can identify the local speed limit allowing the driver to set the speed limiter appropriately. A lane departure warning system is also standard across the model range.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Peugeot 3008 1,6l Hdi Active
Body Type - 5 door SUV
Year Of Publication 2016
Kerb Weight 1300kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all 3008s (including 3008 Hybrid4) and 5008s
Class Small SUV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
The Peugeot 5008 is structurally identical to the 3008 except for extra length in the rear and a third row of seats. Euro NCAP has reviewed data and conducted additional tests to confirm that the 5008 shares the same rating as the 3008 originally tested.
Share
The passenger compartment of the 3008 remained stable in the offset frontal impact test. Dummy readings of chest compression revealed marginal protection of the driver's chest. Good protection was seen for the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Peugeot demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection was good for critical body areas except the neck for the rear passenger and the chest and neck for the driver, protection of which was adequate. In the side barrier test, the 3008 scored maximum points with good protection of all critical body regions. In the more sever side pole impact, the chest was adequately protected and all other body areas were well protected. Tests on the front seats and head restraints showed good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision and a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated the same level of protection there. In the 5008, the third row seats did not pass the whiplash assessment. For this car, the score for adult occupant protection is reduced from 86 percent to 85 percent but the star rating is unaffected. Some grades of the 3008 are equipped with an autonomous emergency braking system which would further protect against whiplash injury. Tests showed good performance but, as the system is not standard across the model range, its results are not included in this assessment.