- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
![](https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/82519/whiplashrearimage.png)
![](https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/82518/whiplashfrontimage.png)
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
![](https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/82511/frontalimpactchildseatsimage.png)
![](https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/82512/sideimpactchildseatsimage.png)
Passenger
outboard
center
outboard
Fitted to the vehicle as standard
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
Easy
Difficult
Safety critical
Not allowed
Seat Position | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Front | 2nd row | 3rd row | ||||
Passenger | Left | center | Right | Left | Right | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Easy
Difficult
Safety critical
Not allowed
The Austral provided good or adequate protection to all critical body areas of the 6 and 10 year dummies, both in the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. The user manual precludes the use of universal child restraints on the rear centre seat. Otherwise, all of the child restraints for which the Austral is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
![VRU Impact Protection](https://cdn.euroncap.com/media/82522/pedestriancrashimage.png)
Head Impact 14.1 Pts
Pelvis Impact 2.7 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
System Name | Active Emergency Braking System | ||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
Operational From | 8 km/h | ||
PERFORMANCE | |
-
Cyclist from nearside, obstructed view
-
Approaching a crossing cyclist
-
Cyclist along the roadside
The protection offered by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with areas of weak and poor protection at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good or adequate protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test positions but protection of the pelvis was mixed. The Espace's autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system detects vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests of the system's response to such road-users, performance was rated as good, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most test scenarios.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
System Name | Speed Limiter |
Speed Limit Information Function | Camera based, subsigns supported |
Speed Control Function | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Applies To | Front and rear seats, including third row | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Occupant Detection | |||
|
System Name | Driver Attention Alert |
Type | steering input |
Operational From | 60 km/h |
System Name | Lane Keep Assist |
Type | LKA and ELK |
Operational From | 65 km/h |
Performance | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Human Machine Interface |
System Name | Active Emergency Braking System | |||
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Operational From | 7 km/h | |||
Sensor Used | camera and radar |
The Espace’s autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles, with impacts avoided in most test cases. A seatbelt reminder system, including occupant detection, is standard for all seats and the Espace is also equipped with a driver monitoring system, which monitors steering inputs for patterns which are characteristic of a fatigued or inattentive driver. Lane assistance corrects the car's path if it is drifting out of lane and which also intervenes in some more critical situations. A camera based speed assistance system recognises local speed limits, allowing the speed limiter to be set appropriately.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Renault Austral 1,3 Tce
Body Type - 5 door MPV
Year Of Publication 2022
Kerb Weight 1502kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Espaces
Class Large MPV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
Fitted to the vehicle as standard
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
Not available
Not applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door MPV | 1,2 Tce E-Tech 200 Hybrid * | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant and Renault Austral 1,3 Tce, LHD
![](/gfx/stars5-148x36.png)
![](/gfx/icon-yes36x36.png)
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
![](/gfx/share20x20.png)
The passenger compartment of the Espace remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Analysis of the driver's side dashboard after the test revealed some areas which could be more injurious to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver’s chest was rated as weak, based on dummy readings of compression. This is a poorer results than that of the Austral, where chest protection was marginal, but the overall star rating is not affacted. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Espace would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full width rigid barrier test, dummy readings of chest compression revealed marginal protection of this body region for the rear passenger. All other critical body areas were rated as good or adequate, both for the driver and rear passenger. In both the side barrier test and the more severe pole impact, protection of all critical body regions was good and the Espace scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Limitation of occupant excursion - the extent to which the occupant is flung to the other side of the vehicle in a side impact - was rated as adequate. The Espace has a centre airbag as a counter-measure against occupant to occupant injuries in side impacts. In Euro NCAP’s test, the airbag performed well, with good protection of the heads of the front seat occupants. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injures in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Espace has an advanced eCall system to alert the emergency services in the event of a collision and a system that automatically to avoid secondary collisions, although the latter was not assessed by Euro NCAP.