Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
In the dynamic tests, dummy readings of load and acceleration were not excessive. The head of the 3 year dummy did not move forward too far in the frontal impact and both dummies were properly contained by their restraints in the side impact. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear and the system was not rewarded.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 6.8 Pts
Pelvis Impact 2.3 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points for providing good protection to pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet did not perform so well and was rated as predominantly marginal. The bonnet offered poor protection in most areas likely to be struck by the head of a child or an adult.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
System Name | ESP | |
Performance |
Applies To | All seats | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
--safetyAssistCommentEN--
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Renault Grand Scenic, 1.5 diesel 'Expression', LHD
Body Type - 5 door MPV
Year Of Publication 2009
Kerb Weight 1507kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Grand Scenics of specification tested
Class Small MPV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Fitted to the vehicle as option
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
- Not Applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated generally good protection, with adequate protection for the chest of both front seat occupants. The knees, femurs and pelvis were well protected in the test and Renault showed that a similar level of protection would be available to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Maximum points were scored in the side barrier test and the chest was adequately protected in the more severe side pole impact. Protection against whiplash injuries in a rear impact was rated as marginal.