- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
82% -
See More
![]()
62% -
See More
![]()
65% -
See More
![]()
43%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X1 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, protection of the 10 year dummy's neck was rated as poor, based on dummy readings of neck tensile forces. Similarly, decelerations in the chest of the 6 year dummy indicated poor protection of this body region. In the side impact, both dummies were properly restrained and protected. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Tivoli is designed could be properly installed and accommodated. The user manual states that the front passenger seat is not suitable for iSize restraints and the Tivoli lost points for those restraints in that seating position.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 14.5 Pts
Pelvis Impact 2.7 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
| System Name | AEBS/FCW | ||
| Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
| Operational From | 8 km/h | ||
| Additional Information | Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light | ||
| PERFORMANCE | | |||
| Autobrake Function | |||
| Avoidance | Mitigation | ||
|
Running Adult crossing from Farside
|
Collision avoided up to 20 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 45 km/h | |
|
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25%
|
Collision avoided up to 30 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 55 km/h | |
|
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75%
|
Collision avoided up to 45 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 55 km/h | |
|
Running Child from behind parked vehicles
|
Collision avoided up to 25 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 45 km/h | |
The protection provided by the bonnet to a pedestrian's head was predominantly good or adequate, with poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs, with good results recorded at all test locations. However, the protection provided to the pelvis was more mixed, ranging from good to poor. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system can detect pedestrians and performed well in Euro NCAP's tests, with collision avoidance or mitigation in several of the test scenarios.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | AEBS/FCW | |||
| Type | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| Operational From | 8 km/h | |||
| Additional Information | Default On | |||
| Performance | | ||||
| Autobrake Function Only | Driver reacts to warning | |||
| Operational Speed | 8-180 km/h | 8-180 km/h | ||
| Approaching a stationary car | See AEB City | Crash avoided up to 50km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 70km/h. | ||
| Approaching a slower moving car | Crash avoided up to 55km/h. | Crash avoided up to 80km/h. | ||
| Following a car at short distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Mitigation | Mitigation | ||
| Following a car at long distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Mitigation | Mitigation | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
The XLV has, as standard, a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. Autonomous emergency braking is, from February 2018, standard equipment and operates at highway speeds. Tests of this functionality demonstrated good performance, with accident avoidance or mitigation in several of the scenarios tested.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model SsangYong Tivoli diesel, LHD
Body Type - 5 door SUV
Year Of Publication 2016
Kerb Weight 1435kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all XLVs from February 2018
Class Small Family Car
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
The SsangYong XLV is exactly the same as the SsangYong Tivoli apart from a slightly extended rear end. In terms of safety performance, the two cars are identical. The results presented here for the XLV are based on tests conducted on the better-selling Tivoli. The same scores and rating applies to both vehicles.
The rating for the Ssangyong XLV was first published in 2016. At that time, autonomous emergency braking was sold as an option, as part of a safety pack, and Euro NCAP published two ratings: one with only standard equipment and another with the safety pack. Since February 2018, the content of the safety pack - AEB City, AEB Inter-urban and AEB Pedestrian - has been made standard equipment and the rating has been changed to reflect this change.
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the offset deformable frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. SsangYong showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Readings of chest compression indicated marginal protection of that body region. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good except for the chest, protection of which was adequate. However, proper retention of the rear dummy failed, allowing excessive forward movement and protection of the head was rated as poor. As a result, the carlost all points for that dummy. SsangYong are investigating the cause of the failure. In the side barrier impact, maximum points were scored, with good protection of all critical body areas. Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other critical body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. From February 2018, the XLV has an autonomous emergency braking system as standard equipment. This system operates at low speeds, typical of city driving, where many whiplash injuries are caused. The system scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's tests, with full avoidance at all speeds when tested against a stationary car.