Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
94% -
See More
![]()
82% -
See More
![]()
67% -
See More
![]()
66%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Safety critical| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
 |
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the Corolla scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy. The head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, did not move forward excessively in the frontal impact. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by their restraints, minimising the likelihod of dangerous head contacts with parts of the car interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Special care was needed to fit the ISOFIX probes of the group I child restraint in the rear outboard seats. Otherwise, the restraints for which the car is designed could be installed without a problem. From September, the information in the user manual will be revised and the rating reflects this revision. Physical installation of child restraints in earlier cars is unaffected but care should be taken as information in the manual may not be as clear.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 16.4 Pts
Pelvis Impact 1.8 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points with good protection of pedestrians' legs in all areas tested. However, the front edge of the bonnet provided predominantly poor protection to the pelvis of a struck pedestrian. The bonnet surface was mostly good or adequate in the level of protection it offered to the head of a struck pedestrian.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | VSC | |
| Performance | ||
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.353% | meets ECE requirements |
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 1.119% | meets ECE requirements |
| Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.16 m | meets ECE requirements |
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
Electronic stability control is standard equipment and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. The front and rear seats are protected by a standard-fit seatbelt reminder system. There is no speed limitation device on the Corolla.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Toyota Corolla, 1.6 Mid grade, LHD
Body Type - 4 door saloon
Year Of Publication 2013
Kerb Weight 1290kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all Corollas of the specification tested
Class Small Family Car
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Toyota showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different statures and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, the Corolla demonstrated good protection of all body regions and scored maximum points. Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. The seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.