Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
89% -
See More
![]()
75% -
See More
![]()
69% -
See More
![]()
86%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as optionThe head of the 3 year dummy moved forward beyond the recommened limit in the frontal impact, potentially allowing contact with parts of the car's interior. However, the dummy was not ejected from the restraint and, in the side impact, both the 3 year and the 18 month dummy were properly contained by their respective seats. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing resrtraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag. A permanent label clearly warns of the dangers of using that seating position for a rearward facing child seat without first disabling the airbag.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 18.8 Pts
Pelvis Impact 0.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The Verso scored well for pedestrian protection. The bumper scored maximum points for protection of pedestrians' legs. The protection provided by the bonnet was good in most areas likely to be struck by an adult or a child. However, the car scored no points for the protection offered by the front edge of the bonnet.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | ESP | |
| Performance | ||
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
FailEletronic stability control is standard equipment on all variants of the Verso. A seatbelt reminder system is also standard, covering the front and rear seats.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Toyota Verso, 2.0 D-4D mid grade, LHD
Body Type - 5 door MPV
Year Of Publication 2010
Kerb Weight 1495kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Versos of the specification tested
Class Small Mpv
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs. Toyota were able to demonstrate that a simiar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different seating positions. The car scored maximum points in the side barrier impact. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on rib defelections measured by the dummy. Protection of the neck against whiplash injuries in a rear collision was also rated as marginal.