- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
outboard
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Seat Position | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Front | 2nd row | 3rd row | ||||
Passenger | Left | center | Right | Left | Right | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
In both the frontal offset and side barrier tests, protection of all critical body areas was good for both the 6 year and 10 year dummy, and maximum points were scored in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 14.4 Pts
Pelvis Impact 5.2 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
System Name | Front Assist | ||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
Operational From | 5 km/h | ||
PERFORMANCE | |
-
Cyclist from nearside, obstructed view
-
Approaching a crossing cyclist
-
Cyclist along the roadside
The protection offered by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed, with areas of good and poor performance. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test points but the protection provided to the pelvis by the front edge of the bonnet was, again, mixed. The Multivan has an autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system which can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians and to cyclists, with impacts avoided in many scenarios.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
System Name | Speed Assistance System |
Speed Limit Information Function | Camera & Map, subsigns supported |
Speed Control Function | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Applies To | Front and rear seats, including third row | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Occupant Detection | |||
|
System Name | Driver Monitoring |
Type | Steering input |
Operational From | 65 km/h |
System Name | Lane Assist |
Type | LKA and ELK |
Operational From | 60 km/h |
Performance | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Human Machine Interface |
System Name | Front Assist | |||
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Operational From | 5 km/h | |||
Sensor Used | camera and radar |
The Multivan has a seatbelt reminder system on the front and rear seating positions. The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles, with impacts avoided in most test scenarios. A speed assistance system combines camera information with digital mapping to identify local speed limits and presents this information to the driver, allowing the limiter to be set appropriately. A lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and intervenes more aggressively in some more critical situations.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model VW Multivan eHybrid, LHD
Body Type - 5 door MPV
Year Of Publication 2022
Kerb Weight 2050kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all VW Multivans
Class Business and Family Vans
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
- Not available
- Not applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door MPV | 1.4 petrol TSI PHEV 160 kW * | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door MPV | 1.5 petrol TSI 100 kW | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door MPV | 2.0 petrol TSI 150 kW | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door MPV | 2.0 diesel TDI 100 kW | 4 x 2 |
* Tested variant
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Multivan remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings showed good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. VW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. With the exception of the driver’s lower leg, protection of which was rated as adequate, protection of all critical body areas was good for both the driver and front seat passenger. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Multivan would be an aggressive impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, all protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate. In both the side barrier test and the more severe pole impact, dummy readings indicated good protection of all critical body areas. However, inspection of the pole test vehicle revealed that one of the clips which holds the side curtain airbag to the roof rail had become detached. The score for the head was penalised for this unintended behaviour, both in the pole test and the side barrier impact where the airbag also plays a critical role. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be marginal. The Multivan has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts and this performed well in Euro NCAP's test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Multivan has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact, to avoid secondary collisions.