- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
97% -
See More
![]()
84% -
See More
![]()
71% -
See More
![]()
60%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult
Safety critical| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, protection of both dummies was good or adequate except for the neck of the 10 year dummy, for which readings of tensile forces indicated weak protection. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was good for all critical parts of the body. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 14.9 Pts
Pelvis Impact 3.4 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
| System Name | Forward Collision Warning (FCW) with Autonomous Emergency Brake (AEB) | ||
| Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
| Operational From | 4 km/h | ||
| Additional Information | Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light | ||
| PERFORMANCE | | |||
| Autobrake Function | |||
| Avoidance | Mitigation | ||
|
Running Adult crossing from Farside
|
Collision avoided up to 40 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h | |
|
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25%
|
Collision avoided up to 40 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h | |
|
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75%
|
Collision avoided up to 50 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h | |
|
Running Child from behind parked vehicles
|
Collision avoided up to 35 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h | |
The protection provided by the bonnet surface to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, but weak and poor results were recorded along the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper scored maximum points for the protection it provided to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis region was mixed. The autonomous emergency braking system can detect pedestrians as well as other vehicles. The system performed well in tests, with collisions avoided or mitigated in all cases.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | Speed Limiter |
| Speed Limit Information Function | N/A |
| Warning Function | 0 |
| Speed Limitation Function | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Lane Departure Warning |
| Type | Lane Departure Warning |
| Operational From | 60 km/h |
| Warning | Audible |
| Performance | |
|
LDW Confirmation Test
|
Pass |
| System Name | Forward Collision Warning (FCW) with Autonomous Emergency Brake (AEB) | |||
| Type | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| Operational From | 7 km/h | |||
| Additional Information | Default On; Supplementary Warning | |||
| Performance | | ||||
| Autobrake Function Only | Driver reacts to warning | |||
| Operational Speed | 7-200 km/h | 30-200 km/h | ||
| Approaching a stationary car | See AEB City | Crash avoided up to 50km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 55km/h. | ||
| Approaching a slower moving car | Crash avoided up to 70km/h. | Crash avoided up to 80km/h. | ||
| Following a car at short distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Following a car at long distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests at highway speeds with collisions avoided in almost all test scenarios and speeds. The Stelvio has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats and also a standard-fit lane departure warning system. A driver-set speed limiter is also standard but the method for setting the speed was too complicated to comply with Euro NCAP's requirements and the system was not rewarded.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2.2 diesel 'Super', 4x4, LHD
Body Type - 5 door SUV
Year Of Publication 2017
Kerb Weight 1745kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Stelvios
Class Large SUV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
| Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | |||
| 5 door SUV | 2.2 diesel, Automatic* | 4x4 |  |
|
| 5 door SUV | 2.2 diesel, Automatic | 4x2 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol, Automatic | 4x4 | |
|
* Tested variant
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Stelvio remained stable in the frontal offset test. For the front passenger, dummy readings indicated good protection of all critical body areas. For both dummies, protection of the knees and femurs was good and Alfa Romeo showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid-barrier test, protection of the driver was good and that of the rear passenger was good except for the chest, protection of which was adequate. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated good whiplash protection for occupants sat there. The Stelvio has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. Tests of its functionality at low speeds typical of city driving showed good performance, with collisions avoided at all test speeds.