Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
87% -
See More
![]()
85% -
See More
![]()
65% -
See More
![]()
74%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Seat
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult
Safety critical| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the dynamic crash tests the Renegade scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year and 3 year dummies, both of which were sat in rearward-facing group 0+/1 child restraints. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of head contact with the vehicle interior. The front passenger seat can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Renegade is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 16.1 Pts
Pelvis Impact 1.5 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points, showing good protection of pedestrians' legs at all test locations. However, the protection provided by the front edge of the bonnet to the pelvis was predominantly weak or poor. The bonnet showed good protection of a pedestrian's head over most of its surface and was adequate elsewhere. Only on the stiff windscreen pillars were poor results recorded.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Speed Limitation Function | Manually Set |
| System Name | ESC | |
| Performance | ||
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Forward Collision Mitigation Plus | |||
| Type | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| Operational From | 30 km/h | |||
| Additional Information | Default On; Supplementary Warning | |||
| Performance | | ||||
| Autobrake Function Only | Driver reacts to warning | |||
| Operational Speed | 30-80 km/h | 30-80 km/h | ||
| Approaching a slower moving car | Crash avoided up to 65km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 70km/h. | Crash avoided up to 80km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 0km/h. | ||
| Following a car at short distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Mitigation | Mitigation | ||
| Following a car at long distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
The Renegade has electronic stability control as standard equipment, together with a seatbelt reminder that protects the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limitation device is also standard and met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of this type. An autonomous emergency braking system is an option. The system operates from the low speeds typical of city driving to the higher speeds found on the open road. As it is expected to be fitted to most cars sold its higher-speed functionality was included in the assessment and was found to perform well. A lane-assistance system is available as an option on the Renegade but was not included in the assessment as it is not expected to meet Euro NCAP's fitment requirements.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Jeep Renegade 1.6 diesel Limited FW, LHD
Body Type - 5 door SUV
Year Of Publication 2014
Kerb Weight 1390kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all Renegades of the specification tested
Class Small SUV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Jeep showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different statures and to those sat in different positions, whose kness might strike the dashboard at different locations. All parts of the passenger dummy were well protected in the frontal test. in the side impact, the Renegade scored maximum points, with good protection of all critical body regions. Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good. Protection against whiplash in the event of a rear-end collision was rated as marginal for both the front and rear seating positions. The Renegade has an optional autonomous braking system which operates from low speeds, typical of city driving. As the system is not standard, its low-speed functionality did not qualify for inclusion in this part of the assessment.