Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
91% -
See More
![]()
80% -
See More
![]()
70% -
See More
![]()
81%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X1 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
 |
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the frontal test, protection of the 10 year dummy was good apart from the neck, protection of which was adequate. Readings from the 6 year dummy indicated weak chest protection and a marginal level of neck protection. In the side impact, protection of both child dummies was good and the Niro scored maximum points. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraints for which the Niro is designed could be properly installed and accommodated apart from the Universal Group I and Group II/III restraints in the rear centre seat.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 13.9 Pts
Pelvis Impact 4.4 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
| System Name | AEB | ||
| Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
| Operational From | 10 km/h | ||
| Additional Information | Defaults on for every journey; operates in low ambient light | ||
| PERFORMANCE | | |||
| Autobrake Function | |||
| Avoidance | Mitigation | ||
|
Running Adult crossing from Farside
|
Collision avoided up to 45 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h | |
|
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25%
|
Collision avoided up to 55 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h | |
|
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75%
|
Collision avoided up to 60 km/h | ||
|
Running Child from behind parked vehicles
|
Collision avoided up to 40 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h | |
The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection against head injuries, with poor results recorded along the edges and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs at all test points. Protection of the pelvis was mostly good, although poor results were recorded at the outer edges. The 'Advanced Driving Assistance Pack' includes an autonomous emergency braking system which can detect pedestrians. The system performed well in Euro NCAP's tests, impact being avoided in many scenarios and mitigated in others.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | Speed Limiter |
| Speed Limit Information Function | N/A |
| Warning Function | Manually set |
| Speed Limitation Function | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Lane Keep Assist |
| Type | Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning |
| Operational From | 55 km/h |
| Warning | Audible |
| Performance | |
|
LKA Confirmation Test
|
Pass (5/5) |
|
LDW Confirmation Test
|
Pass |
| System Name | AEB | |||
| Type | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| Operational From | 10 km/h | |||
| Additional Information | Default On | |||
| Performance | | ||||
| Autobrake Function Only | Driver reacts to warning | |||
| Operational Speed | 10-180 km/h | 10-180 km/h | ||
| Approaching a stationary car | See AEB City | Crash avoided up to 50km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 80km/h. | ||
| Approaching a slower moving car | Crash avoided up to 70km/h. | Crash avoided up to 80km/h. | ||
| Following a car at short distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Mitigation | Mitigation | ||
| Following a car at long distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
The Niro has a standard seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limiter is also standard, together with a lane assistance system that warns the driver when the car is drifting out of lane and gently steers the car away from the lane marker. The autonomous emergency braking system operates at highway speeds and performed well in tests with impacts being avoided in several scenarios and the impact speed reduced in others.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Kia Niro GL, 1.6GDI Hybrid, LHD
Safety Pack Name Advanced Driving Assistance Pack
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2016
Kerb Weight 1414kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - Kia Niros, including PHEVs, with Advanced Driving Assistance Pack
Class Small Family Car
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Kia showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width frontal impact, protection of the driver was good or adequate. However, protection of the rear seat occupant was rated as weak for the chest and poor for the pelvis. Dummy readings indicated that the pelvis had slipped under the seatbelt instead of being properly restrained by it. In the side barrier and more severe side pole impact, the Niro scored maximum points, with good protection of all critical body areas. Tests showed good protection from the front seats and head restraints against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal protection. Additional whiplash protection is available from the optional 'Advanced Driving Assistance Pack' which contains an autonomous emergency braking system which operates at the low speeds typical of city driving. The system performed well in Euro NCAP's tests