Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
outboard
center
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
-
Infants up to 13 kg
-
Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg
-
Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg
-
Toddlers over 18 kg
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Seat Position | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Front | 2nd row | 3rd row | ||||
Passenger | Left | center | Right | Left | Right | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Based on dummy readings in the crash tests, the car scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy. Forward movment of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive but forces in the neck were high and chest acceleration indicated only fair protection of this body region. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the markings for the switch are not sufficiently clear and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the vehicle is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 13.3 Pts
Pelvis Impact 3.5 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and scored maximum points. The performance of the front edge of the bonnet was more mixed: good in some areas but weak or poor in others. The bonnet surface provided mostly good protection to the head of a struck pedestrian but poor results were recorded at the bonnet edges and on the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
System Name | ESP Bosch 8.1 | |
Performance |
Applies To | Front seats | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
--safetyAssistCommentEN--
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Citroën Berlingo 1.6 diesel 'Confort', LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2014
Kerb Weight 1431kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - from VF37J9HP0EJ725408
Class Small MPV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Fitted to the vehicle as option
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
- Not Applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Peugeot have demonstrated that the Partner is identical to the Citroën Berlingo in every way that will influence safety. Therefore, the star rating of the Peugeot Partner is the same as that of the Berlingo and the results of that vehicle are given in this assessment.
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, the steering column and its lock, and the end of the facia were posed a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions and the score was penalised. The vehicle scored maximum points in the side barrier test, with good protection of all body regions. A side impact thorax airbag and a head-protecting curtain airbag are both available as an option but were not fitted to the test vehicle. As the curtain airbag is not standard equipment a pole test was not performed. Protection against whiplash injury in a rear-end collision was rated as marginal for both the front and rear seats.