- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
72% -
See More
![]()
56% -
See More
![]()
59% -
See More
![]()
25%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
 |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the front offset test, dummy readings indicate weak protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy and marginal protection of the neck and chest of the 6 year dummy. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag was not sufficiently clear and the system was not rewarded. Because of this, installation of the belt-mounted universal restraints was deemed a failure. The Giulietta does not have i-Size compatible seating positions, so failed the installation test for such restraints.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 13.6 Pts
Pelvis Impact 5.4 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed, with roughly equal areas of good and poor protection. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs was good while that of the pelvis was mixed.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
The Giulietta has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats and no other safety equipment that is assessed by Euro NCAP.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Alfa Romeo Giulietta1.6 Mjet 'Super', LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2017
Kerb Weight 1355kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Giuliettas
Class Small Family Car
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
| Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | |||
| 5 door hatchback |
1.4 TB 120CV |
4 X 2 |  |
|
| 5 door hatchback |
1.4 TB GPL 120CV |
4 X 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback |
1.4 TURBO MULTI AIR 150CV |
4 X 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback |
1.4 TB MAIR 170CV CM TCT |
4 X 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback |
1.8 TB GDI 240CV QFV TCT |
4 X 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback |
1,6 JTDm 120 CV CM 6M* |
4 X 2 |
|
|
| 5 door hatchback |
1,6 JTDm 120 CV TCT |
4 X 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback |
2,0 JTDm 150 CV CM 6M |
4 X 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback |
2,0 JTDm 175 CV TCT |
4 X 2 | |
|
* Tested variant
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Giulietta remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Alfa Romeo showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest was rated as weak for the rear passenger, based on readings of chest compression and shoulder belt load. Protection of the neck of the driver dummy was also rated as weak. In the side barrier test, the seat-mounted thorax airbag did not deploy correctly, getting trapped behind the intruding trim. Dummy readings were not adversely affected but a penalty was applied to all areas protected by the airbag: thorax, abdomen and pelvis, and protection rated as adequate. As the same airbag is meant to provide protection in the side pole test, the penalties were applied in that test too. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection.