Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
74% -
See More
![]()
63% -
See More
![]()
64% -
See More
![]()
25%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult
Safety critical| Seat Position | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | ||
| Passenger | Left | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the offset frontal test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as weak, as was that of the chest of the 6 year dummy, based on data recorded by the dummies. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest of the 10 year dummy was poor, based on dummy readings of chest deceleration. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Cars from VIN JTDKGNEC60N317420 have revised markings for the top-tethers. All restraint types for which the Aygo is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 16.3 Pts
Pelvis Impact 4.7 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly adequate or marginal on the bonnet surface, with poor results recorded along the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection provided to the pelvis was good in some areas and marginal in others, while the bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs. The autonomous emergency braking system works only for other cars and does not detect pedestrians.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
A seatbelt reminder is standard for the front and rear seats. An autonomous emergency braking system and a lane departure warning system are part of the optional safety pack and are not assessed as part of this rating.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Toyota Aygo 1.0 x-play, LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2017
Kerb Weight 910kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - JTDKGNEC60N317420
Class City and Supermini
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
| Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | |||
| 5 door hatchback | 1.0 petrol* | 4 x 2 |  |
|
* Tested variant
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Aygo remained stable in the frontal offset test. Although dummy readings were good for the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger, structures in the dashboard were thought to present a risk to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions, so the protection provided to this part of the body was downgraded to marginal. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the head, neck and chest of the rear passenger dummy was rated as poor and no points were scored for this dummy. Protection of the driver dummy in the same test was good or adequate. In both the side barrier impact and the more severe side pole test, protection of all critical parts of the body was good, and the Aygo scored maximum points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good whiplash protection in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The Aygo has an autonomous emergency braking system as part of an option pack, an assessment of which is not included in this rating.