Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
94% -
See More
![]()
83% -
See More
![]()
64% -
See More
![]()
100%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Front Seat
Car
Pole
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as optionIn the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side barrier test, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the car interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. There is clear labelling in the car of the need to disable to the airbag before a rearward facing child seat is used in the front passenger seat.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 16.9 Pts
Pelvis Impact 0.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and scored maximum points. However, the front edge of the bonnet offered poor protection in all areas tested. In those areas likely to be struck by the head of a child, protection was predominantly marginal or poor. However, good protection was offered by the bonnet in most areas likely to be struck by an adult's head.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | ASC | |
| Performance | ||
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.79% | meets ECE requirements |
| Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s | 1.17% | meets ECE requirements |
| Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.93 m | meets ECE requirements |
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
FailElectronic stability control is standard equipment on the Outlander and passed Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder is provided as standard for the front and rear seats and all cars also have a driver-set speed limitation device.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Advanced Rewards
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Mitsubishi Outlander 2.2 diesel 'Intense', LHD
Body Type - 5 door SUV
Year Of Publication 2012
Kerb Weight 1495kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - applies to all Outlanders of the specification tested
Class Small SUV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as option![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available![]()
Not Applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as optionVideos
Advanced Rewards
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Mitsubishi showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, the Outlander scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy measurements of rib compression indicated marginal protection of the chest. the seat and head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision.