- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
97% -
See More
![]()
84% -
See More
![]()
79% -
See More
![]()
79%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
-
Approaching a stationary car: Left Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: No Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: Right Offset
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
outboard *
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
| Seat Position | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | 3rd row | ||||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | Left | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
 |
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
 |
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both the 6 year and 10 year dummies. In the side barrier test, protection of both child dummies was good and maximum points were scored. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in this seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Tarraco is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the front passenger seat and the second row. However, the optional third row seats were too small to accommodate universal child restraints properly.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 14.9 Pts
Pelvis Impact 6.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
| PERFORMANCE | |
- Day time
- Night time
Day time
-
Adult crossing the road
-
Child running from behind parked vehicles
-
Adult along the roadside
Night time
-
Adult crossing the road
-
Adult along the roadside
-
Approaching a crossing cyclist
-
Cyclist along the roadside
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate over most of its surface, with areas of good and poor performance. Protection of pedestrian's legs and of the pelvis area was good in all test areas and the Tarraco scored maximum points. The AEB system can detect pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. The system performed well when tested for its reaction to vulnerable road users such as these.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | SEAT Speed Limiter |
| Speed Control Function | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Applies To | Not available | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
| Occupant Detection | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Lane Assist |
| Type | LKA (including LDW) |
| Operational From | 60 km/h |
| Performance | |
| Emergency Lane Keeping | |
| Lane Keep Assist | |
| Human Machine Interface | |
| System Name | Front Assist | |||
| Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
| Operational From | 10 km/h | |||
| Additional Information | Supplementary warning | |||
- Autobrake function only
- Driver reacts to warning
Autobrake function only
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a braking car
Driver reacts to warning
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a braking car
The AEB system gave generally good results in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. The car has a lane assistance system which helps prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane but can also intervene in some more critical situations. A driver-seat speed assistance system allows the limiter to be manually set to the appropriate speed. A seatbelt reminder is standard for front and rear seats.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model SEAT Tarraco 1.5 TSI R4, LHD
Body Type - Large SUV
Year Of Publication 2019
Kerb Weight 1524kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Tarracos
Class Large Off-Road 4x4
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
| Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | |||
| 5 door SUV | 1.5 petrol* | 4 x 2 |  |
|
| 5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | 4 x 4 | |
|
* Tested variant
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Tarraco remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. SEAT showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good for all critical body areas. For the rear dummy, protection was goof or adequate for all critical parts of the body. In both the side barrier test and the side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the Tarraco scored maximum points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.