- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
Adult Occupant
See More
92% -
Child Occupant
See More
83% -
Vulnerable Road Users
See More
74% -
Safety Assist
See More
93%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Rear Seat
Front Seat
| Rescue Sheet |
Available, ISO compliant
|
|||
| Advanced eCall | Available | |||
| Multi Collision Brake | Available | |||
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option- Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
- Easy
Difficult
Safety critical- Not allowed
| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
In the frontal offset, protection was good for all critical body areas of the 10 year dummy. Readings of head accelerations in the 6 year dummy indicated marginal protection but that of other critical body areas was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good for both the child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the ORA 03 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 13.9 Pts
Pelvis Impact 5.2 Pts
Leg Impact 5.9 Pts
| System Name | Automatic Emergency Braking + MEB | ||
| Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
| Operational From | 1 km/h | ||
| PERFORMANCE | | |||
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with some areas of poor protection along the front edge of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper offered good protection or adequate to pedestrians’ legs and protection of the pelvis region was also good or adequate at all test locations. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the ORA 03 can respond to vulnerable road users, as well as to other vehicles. The system performed well both in tests of its response to pedestrians and when tested with a cyclist target, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most scenarios.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | Traffic Assist |
| Speed Limit Information Function | Camera based, subsigns supported |
| Speed Control Function | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Applies To | Front and rear seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
| Occupant Detection | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Driver Monitoring System |
| Type | direct eye monitoring |
| Operational From | 45 km/h |
| System Name | Lane Assist + ELK |
| Type | LKA and ELK |
| Operational From | 60 km/h |
| Performance | |
| Emergency Lane Keeping |
Good
|
| Lane Keep Assist |
Good
|
| Human Machine Interface |
Good
|
| System Name | Automatic Emergency Braking | |||
| Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
| Operational From | 5 km/h | |||
| Sensor Used | camera and radar | |||
- Autobrake function only
- Driver reacts to warning
Autobrake function only
Driver reacts to warning
The ORA 03’s autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most test scenarios. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats and the car is equipped with a system to detect driver fatigue and distraction. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. The speed assistance system detects the local speed limit and the driver can choose to allow the maximum speed of the car to be automatically set by the system.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model ORA Funky Cat 400 pro+, LHD
Body Type - 5 door hatchback
Year Of Publication 2022
Kerb Weight 1580kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all ORA 03s and Funky Cats
Class Small Family Car
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
- Not available
- Not applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
| Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | ||||
| 5 door hatchback | Electric | 300 | 4 x 2 |  |
|
| 5 door hatchback | Electric | 300 Pro | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | Electric | 400 Pro | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | Electric | 400 Pro+ * | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | Electric | 400 GT | 4 x 2 | |
|
* Tested variant
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
The GWM ORA 03 was known as the ORA Funky Cat until February 2024.
Share
The passenger compartment of the ORA 03 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers demonstrated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. GWM showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the ORA 03 would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate, apart from the chest of the rear passenger, protection of which was rated as marginal on the basis of dummy readings of compression. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The ORA 03 has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts and this performed well in Euro NCAP's test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The ORA 03 has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact to avoid secondary collisions.