- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Seat Position | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Front | 2nd row | |||
Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, readings of tension in the neck of the 10 year dummy indicated poor protection for this body area. Protection of the chest of the 6 year dummy was weak, based on decelerations measured by the dummy. Otherwise, protection of the child dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was good for all critical parts of the body. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Koleos is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 15.0 Pts
Pelvis Impact 5.1 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
The protection provided by the bonnet surface to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper gave good or adequate protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed, with good and poor results. The autonomous emergency braking system is not designed to react to pedestrians.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
System Name | RVLV |
Speed Limit Information Function | Camera based, subsigns supported |
Warning Function | System advised |
Speed Limitation Function | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Applies To | All seats | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
System Name | LDW |
Type | Lane Departure Warning |
Operational From | 0 km/h |
Warning | Audible and Visual |
Performance | |
LDW Confirmation Test
|
Pass |
System Name | AEB IU | |||
Type | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
Operational From | 4 km/h | |||
Additional Information | Default On | |||
Performance | | ||||
Autobrake Function Only | Driver reacts to warning | |||
Operational Speed | 4-160 km/h | 4-160 km/h | ||
Approaching a stationary car | See AEB City | Crash avoided up to 30km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 45km/h. | ||
Approaching a slower moving car | Crash avoided up to 50km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 70km/h. | Crash avoided up to 70km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 80km/h. | ||
Following a car at short distance | ||||
Car in front brakes gently | Mitigation | Mitigation | ||
Car in front brakes harshly | Mitigation | Mitigation | ||
Following a car at long distance | ||||
Car in front brakes gently | Mitigation | Mitigation | ||
Car in front brakes harshly | Mitigation | Mitigation |
The Koleos has a seatbelt reminder as standard for the front and rear seats. The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit and allows the driver to set the limiter appropriately. A lane departure warning system is standard. The autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately in tests of its functionality at highway speeds.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model Renault New Koleos 1.6dci, LHD
Body Type - 5 door SUV
Year Of Publication 2017
Kerb Weight 1623kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Koleos variants
Class Large SUV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
- Not available
- Not applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. With the exception of the driver's right tibia, which rated as marginal, protection of both adult dummies was good, including the knees and femurs. Renault showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the head and chest of the rear passenger was rated as marginal and that of all other critical body areas was good or adequate. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection was good and the Koleos scored maximum points in these tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Koleos has, as standard, an autonomous emergency braking system. Tests of this system's functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused showed good performance.