- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
-
Approaching a stationary car: Left Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: No Offset
-
Approaching a stationary car: Right Offset
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option
- Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
Seat Position | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Front | 2nd row | |||
Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
- Easy
- Difficult
- Safety critical
- Not allowed
In the frontal offset test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both dummies, with the exception of the neck of the 10 year old, for which readings of tensile forces indicated marginal protection. In the side barrier impact, protection was good for all critical parts of the body and the CX-30 scored full points for child occupant protection in this test. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the CX-30 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 18.7 Pts
Pelvis Impact 6.0 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
System Name | SBS (Smart Brake Support) | ||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
Operational From | 10 km/h | ||
PERFORMANCE | |
-
Approaching a crossing cyclist
-
Cyclist along the roadside
The protection offered to the head of a struck pedestrian was good over almost all of the bonnet surface and adequate over much of the rest. Good protection was provided to pedestrians' legs by the bumper and protection of the pelvis was also rated as good at all test locations. The autonomous emergency braking system ('Smart Brake Support') can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In tests of its reaction to such road users, the system performed adequately, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most scenarios.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
System Name | TSR(Traffic Sign Recognition System) / ISA(Intelligent Speed Assistance) |
Speed Limit Information Function | Camera & Map |
Speed Control Function | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Applies To | All Seats | ||
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Occupant Detection | |||
|
System Name | Lane-keep Assist System (LAS) |
Type | LKA (including LDW) |
Operational From | 55 km/h |
Performance | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Human Machine Interface |
System Name | SBS (Smart Brake Support) | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operational From | 4 km/h | |||
Additional Information | Supplementary warning |
The SBS autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality against other vehicles at highway speeds. A seatbelt reminder system is standard equipment for the front and rear seats. A speed assistance system uses a camera and digital mapping to determine the local speed limit. This information is presented to the driver, allowing the speed limiter to be set appropriately. A lane support system helps to avoid inadvertent drifting out of lane by warning the driver and gently correcting the steering of the vehicle.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model MAZDA CX-30 2.0 petrol, LHD
Body Type - 5 door SUV
Year Of Publication 2019
Kerb Weight 1420kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all CX-30s
Class Small SUV
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
- Fitted to the vehicle as standard
- Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
- Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
- Not available
- Not applicable
Videos
Rating Validity
Variants of Model Range
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door SUV | 2.0 litre petrol* | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door SUV | 2.0 litre petrol | 4 x 4 | ||
5 door SUV | 1.8 litre diesel | 4 x 2 | ||
5 door SUV | 1.8 litre diesel | 4 x 4 |
* Tested variant
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the CX-30 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Mazda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of both the driver and rear passenger was good for all critical body areas, and the CX-30 scored maximum points in this test. Likewise, in both the side barrier impact and the more severe side pole test the CX-30 scored maximum points, with good protection all-round. Tests on the front seats and head-restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit 'Smart Brake Support' (SBS) performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which whiplash injuries often occur. With collisions avoided in all test scenarios, the CX-30 scored full points in this part of the assessment.